GoDaddy $6.99.com Special Banner










Now available - Sharing domain stats is easy with DNW Stats.

Domain Hack DealsPl.us Loses Case for DealsPlus.com

Company tries to get “proper” version of its domain through UDRP but fails.

I’ve argued many, many times that you shouldn’t create a web site at a “domain hack”, where the top level domain name is part of the keywords. Here’s just another example, courtesy of a decision at World Intellectual Property Organization.

Sazze, Inc, which operates DealsPl.us, has lost a case brought against the owner of DealsPlus.com.

DealsPl.us is a big web site, getting well over a million unique visits per month according to Compete. But imagine trying to tell someone to go to the actual web site:

“It’s DealsPlus. That’s deals-p-l-dot-u-s.”

That doesn’t work well.

So DealsPl.us filed a UDRP to get the better domain name DealsPlus.com. A three person panel found that the domain name wasn’t registered and used in bad faith.

Like just about every site on a domain hack that has become popular, I bet Sazze wishes it would have done things right from the beginning.

  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Related posts:

  1. Louis Vuitton loses case for LV.com
  2. Roche Loses Valium Domain Case
  3. A Long Morning Thanks to WordPress Hack

Tags: , ,


Comments

  1. July 29th, 2010 | 8:05 am

    Asking price of DealsPlus.com just went WAY up!

  2. July 29th, 2010 | 8:24 am

    Spend $5,000 to bring a case that would cost you $250,000+ regardless of win or loss (as long as defendant knows how to fight). Brilliant!

  3. dp
    July 29th, 2010 | 8:27 am

    With hindsight this is easy to say. There’s a million dating sites out there, a million deals and coupons site, a million games sites, etc. So you decide you’re going to make one, odds are against you but it costs almost nothing to get started and there’s a big win if you get it right. You’re not going to invest a few grand+ in a better domain right at the start unless you are really sure of yourself. Lots of these sites start as a hobby, a quality name is simply out of reach until they establish a level of success and at that point it is “too late” to get that name at the “below the radar price”.

    I’m not saying this is a good approach, just that I can see how it happens time and time again. I guess is a good thing for domainers. Now big corporations or well-funded groups launching without the .com for their product / brand, well that is just dumb :)

  4. July 29th, 2010 | 8:46 am

    @ dp – fair point. I’ve often “tried out” site ideas with inferior domains.

  5. July 29th, 2010 | 9:07 am

    http://delicio.us
    http://delicious.com/

    http://Toys.R.US

    http://Bit.LY

    But, as you say, “do it right”.
    …pick a 4-letter .COM and build a brand…
    http://WOOT.com

  6. mrx
    July 29th, 2010 | 10:35 am

    @dp “but it costs almost nothing to get started”

    It takes a lot of time, hard work and money to make a succesful website.

  7. dp
    July 29th, 2010 | 10:47 am

    Of course it does, but you can *get started* on almost no budget. A domain, a cheap host, a text editor, an ability to learn, that’s it.

  8. Jakbqwik
    July 29th, 2010 | 11:04 am

    Heard a rumor (can’t get confirmation yet) of a LL.com that just sold yesterday for an amount that will place it in the top 3 of all time.

    I’m not disclosing the domain here, because my source swore me to secrecy. This deal WAS NOT brokered by a company, but it is being purchased by someone who is making a mark in the “social mobile” world…the buyer IS NOT a large company, just a start-up with deep pockets.

    The news should be coming out sometime next week, but I can’t guarantee it.

Leave a reply


TOP