This is the first of ten posts counting down the top 10 stories on Domain Name Wire in 2017, as ranked by pageviews.
What is the role of a domain name registrar when it comes to the content of a website? The common answer was tested in 2017.
Traditionally, domain name registrars have tried to stay out of the content policing business. They argue that domain names are merely pointers and that content issues should be handled by web hosting companies.
That’s the initial stand that GoDaddy took with DailyStormer.com, a domain name registered at the registrar that pointed to a racist website hosted elsewhere. The registrar continued to be the registrar for the domain name despite frequent criticism.
[clickToTweet tweet=”#10 in 2017: How DailyStormer.com got domain registrars to change protocol” quote=”#10 in 2017: How DailyStormer.com got domain registrars to change protocol”]
That all changed after the White Nationalist rally in Virginia in which a man ran over and killed a counter-protester. Daily Stormer posted a hateful article about the victim. GoDaddy decided enough was enough and said that it was booting the domain name because it violated its policy of not inciting violence.
GoDaddy kicked the problem to another registrar by telling the DailyStormer.com owner that he needed to move his domain elsewhere.
That elsewhere was Google. Why the owner chose Google’s registrar is beyond me.
Google went a big step further than GoDaddy. Instead of telling the domain owner to move, it put the domain in ClientHold status, effectively rendering the domain useless. That’s where it stands today.
The site then moved to some alternative top level domains and even the dark web.
While registrars would like to deflect responsibility to hosts, the mood following the violent Virginia rally made it hard for registrars to ignore. Many free speech groups blasted the registrars for their decisions, and I suspect registrars will reconsider their stances with hindsight when similar cases appear in the future.
John Colascione says
The registrars should not have let their emotions or opinions on what was or wasn’t going to be finally be enough. They should have stayed out of it entirely. Now they have opened up a can of worms and will have to police all sorts of uncomfortable situations.
Joseph Peterson says
Much as I detest Nazis, free speech isn’t free if it’s selectively protected and curtailed.
Minority opinions are often considered reprehensible by majorities. And sometimes (hopefully) evil IS in the minority. But sometimes it’s in the majority, or the faction in power. Unless minority opinions can be expressed without retribution, sooner or later we all live under despots.
Registrars ought to be neutral. Or else their policies that restrict content / usage ought to be very clear to users before they begin depending on the registrar. In practice, that can be difficult. But that ought to be the goal.