Featured Domains


Panel faults ICANN and tells it to make a decision on .web

Panel determines that ICANN violated its bylaws by failing to make a decision about Verisign’s deal for .web.

Picture of a laptop computer, a cup of coffee and a plant on a desk with the word .web in white letters on a green background.

“…[ICANN] has violated its commitment to make decisions by applying documented policies objectively and fairly.”

This is the big takeaway from an Independent Review Panel (IRP) decision regarding a long-running dispute over the .web top level domain name. ICANN consistently avoids making decisions to the detriment of its contracted parties and the internet community, and the battle over .web is a prime example.

Now, it’s being asked to show up and make a decision.

The dispute stems from the auction for the rights to the .web top level domain name.

Nu Dot Co, a business founded by .Co Internet’s founders, applied for the .web top level domain. After the application period closed, Verisign (NASDAQ: VRSN) decided it wanted to own .web and worked out a deal with Nu Dot Co in which Nu Dot Co would bid in the auction and Verisign would then buy the top level domain from it.

Nu Dot Co (NDC) won the auction for $135 million, which was the amount of the second-highest bid, placed by applicant Afilias.

Other applicants were upset. Not only did their rival Verisign win the auction, but Nu Dot Co decided to use an ICANN auction of last resort rather than a private auction in which the losing applicants stood to earn tens of millions of dollars each.

Donuts, another applicant, subsequently sued, but the judge dismissed the case.

After Donuts exhausted its options, Afilias picked up the baton and filed for cooperative engagement with ICANN. Then it escalated to the Independent Review Process.

Yesterday, ICANN published the IRP decision. The IRP determined that ICANN:

has violated its Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, as
approved by the ICANN Board on 9 August 2016, and filed on 3 October 2016 (Articles), and its Bylaws for Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, as amended on 18 June 2018 (Bylaws)…

…by failing to make a decision.

The panel wrote:

It may be fair to say, as averred in the [ICANN’s] Response, that “ICANN has been caught in the middle of this dispute between powerful and well-funded businesses”. However, in the Panel’s view, it is not open to [ICANN] to add, as it does in the same sentence of its Response, “[and ICANN] has not taken sides”, as if [ICANN] had no responsibility in bringing about a resolution of the dispute by itself taking a position as to the propriety of NDC’s arrangements with Verisign.

In the opinion of the Panel, there is an inherent contradiction between proceeding with the delegation of .WEB to NDC, as [ICANN] was prepared to do in June 2018, and recognizing that issues raised in connection with NDC’s arrangements with Verisign are serious, deserving of [ICANN] consideration, and remain to be addressed by [ICANN] and its Board, as was determined by the Board in November 2016. A necessary implication of [ICANN’s] decision to proceed with the delegation of .WEB to NDC in June 2018 was some implicit finding that NDC was not in breach of the New gTLD Program Rules and, by way of consequence, the implicit rejection of the [Afilias’] allegations of non-compliance with the Guidebook and Auction Rules. This is difficult to reconcile with the submission that “ICANN has taken no position on whether NDC violated the Guidebook”.

Essentially, ICANN should have made a decision on whether the deal between Nu Dot Co and Verisign complied with the New gTLD Program Rules or not. Instead, it seems to have hoped that either the competing bidders would drop the matter or some outside group would make this decision for it.

The IRP determined that it did not have authority to decide that Afilias, the runner-up in the auction, should get the domain. It merely decided that ICANN has to do its duty: make a decision! At the same time, the IRP ordered ICANN to pay the majority of Afilias’ expenses and fees for the IRP.

So what does ICANN have to say about this? It still hopes to avoid making a decision. In a post on its website, it states:

The ICANN Board will consider the Final Declaration as soon as feasible, within the timeframe prescribed in the Bylaws, and remains hopeful that the relevant .WEB applicants will continue to seek alternatives to resolve the dispute between them raised during the IRP. (emphasis added)

Verisign issued a statement today urging ICANN’s board to proceed with contracting the domain.

The most in-depth analysis of the global domain market

Get Our Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest analysis and news about the domain name industry by joining our mailing list.

No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Reader Interactions


    Leave a Comment

  1. Hunter P. says

    Icann has a yearly budget of what $65,000,000 ? They really are becoming worthless and taking the $ 20 million kickback from Verisign was never investigated and likely shady behind the door dealings… They have become a racket… Some group needs to go under the hood over at ICANN and sniff out all the shady stuff happening or actually not happening as they seem to have become almost worthless with a huge overhead and an entity that lost its way.. From FADI to now all this, ICANN needs accountable and rebuilt….

  2. John says

    Please see the comments about the .web matter over here:


    Yes, he was right, that’s me commenting over there. That guy and I have a rocky history in various blog comments unfortunately, even recently. Everything I said there is true. I used to do the simple Google “site:” search all the time and it resulted in many “example.web” search results until the day it finally dropped off a cliff like a rock. I wish Chris Ambler or J.B. had weighed in over there.

  3. MoGreen says

    You may not like Verisign , but they should get .web based on the way ICANN treated every other applicant during the round. Other entities like Wordpress did the same exact thing with .blog it is just people like Automattic so there are no complaints

Domain Name Wire | Domain Name News
%d bloggers like this: