A statistical look at a slice of the domain name market.
Most people agree that the investor aftermarket for domain names isn’t as lofty as it was a couple years ago. Just look at the mood and total sales at live domain auctions for proof. But gathering data to prove this is difficult.
Richard Wixom of DNSalePrice recently took at stab at it, but with a different conclusion: the domain aftermarket is doing just fine, thank you. The drop in domain prices over the past year or two is small compared to the drop in the stock market. At least for three character domains.
Wixom took a narrow band of domain sales that he believes creates a good proxy for the investor market overall: three character domain sales under $30,000. He charted sales from January 2005 to May 2009, stripped out domains with q, x, y, or z, IDNs, and three letter domains that are words. Wixom then plotted these sales on a graph, added a polynomial trend line, and overlayed the Dow Jones Industrial Average. The picture tells the story:
I’m not inclined to see this limited set of data as a proxy for the domain aftermarket overall, but it’s the best attempt I’ve seen to quantify the domain pricing trend using disclosed sales values. One difference between three character domains and the market at large is that three character domains are much more liquid.
I cut Wixom’s data another way, adding in sales over $30,000 and calculating the median. The data show that median prices of three letter domains rose sharply from 2005 to 2007, held steady in 2008, and then dropped substantially in 2009 (with very limited data so far). The median sales price in 2005 was $6,700, 2006 was $10,175, and both 2007 and 2008 was $12,500. So far in 2009, with the disclosed data on DNSalePrice, the median three letter sale is $6,250.
This doesn’t present enough data to suggest a 50% drop year over year, but you don’t need numbers to tell you that the investor resale price of three letter domains has fallen this year. I think it has bottomed out.
Reece Berg says
3Character.com reports a minimum wholesale of $3850 on 3 letter .coms today versus $7600 last June — I honestly believe the minimum today is even below that $3850 suggested price, likely around $3500.
With 3 letter .coms, it would be important to make sure the number of premium and non-premium sales being looked at are identical between now and then, else the data will be heavily skewed. At present, a premium 3 letter .com sells for about 2-3 times more on average than what a 3 letter .com with bad letters in it will sell for.
Kind of off-topic but I must say, Richard sure does create beautiful graphs! 🙂
bernard says
Nice comparison. Let’s go further. An investor’s annual revenue is a minimal 3% the stock value.
Does a 10k LLL.com domain earns $300 a year without any work (e.g. parking revenue)?
Domain Investor says
As you said, this is a first attempt at analyzing domain valuation compared to the stock market (DJIA) which is more liquid.
Eventually, is should also be compared to something that is not as liquid as stocks.
Like, commercial real estate, land, residential property, timeshares, etc.
Great job.
David J Castello says
Judging sales for a group of domains that is categorized by the number of letters in the domain is so 1999.
Would I rather have Omaha.com over BeverlyHills.com? Not in a million years.
Real sales in our industry should be tracked by name (regardless of length), its public recognition/usage and potential value to prospective endusers. And that’s the reason why Ad.com, Toys.com and Candy.com recently sold so well.
Richard Wixom says
David, your last point is the reason for the methodology. As they are unique assets, trends using total sales, averages, etc. are overshadowed by what’s sold. Thus the purpose of the data described is to minimize variability from unique domain characteristics. I might add the data was also evaluated using a normalized index and yielded the same trends. No doubt domain investments are much smarter than stocks.