Featured Domains

TrueName by donuts. Make a name for yourself

Arbitrator: Fired.com Complainant “Sorely Misguided”

World2Work Corporation loses Fired.com claim; panel has harsh words for company and lawyer.

A one person panel has found in favor of the owner of Fired.com in a bizarre UDRP case.

World2Work Corporation and founder Scott R. Sargis, which runs the web site Fired.tv, filed a UDRP with National Arbitration Forum to get the domain name Fired.com. This is despite not registering the trademark “Fired” until five years after Fired.com was registered.

After questioning by Domain Name Wire, World2Work’s attorney John Franczyk released a statement on behalf of the company that seemed to equate trademark law with domain name law and said “we should not be forced to pay the inflated fees that domain name profiteers routinely charge for warehoused domains which they have never bothered to use or develop.”

The arbitrator wrote that World2Work and its attorney were “sorely misguided” in its understanding of trademarks and domain names.

While it is not normally required that the issue of genericness be resolved in the UDRP proceeding, especially when Complainant is the owner of a valid registration, it is important to address the issue when the mark and the domain consist of one or more common terms. Complainant’s belief that its registration gives it “an exclusive right to use the word ‘FIRED’ in commerce…” and that such use extends to a “right to use that word as a domain name and to register the domain as its own domain name” is sorely misguided. Trademark rights do not automatically confer domain name rights and vice-versa.

Because the panel found that Fired.com was not identical or confusingly similar to complainant’s established rights, it didn’t review the other two requirements of a UDRP. It is extremely rare to see a UDRP filing in which the first requirement is not met. Even reverse domain name hijacking cases usually involve the first requirement being met.

The owner of Fired.com did not file his response through an attorney and did not request a finding of reverse domain name hijacking. Had he done so, it is likely that the arbitrator would have charged World2Work with reverse domain name hijacking.

DomainAgents. What should you sell your domain for? Read our Domain Market Report Now. Sponsored.

Get Our Newsletter

Stay up-to-date with the latest analysis and news about the domain name industry by joining our mailing list.


No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Reader Interactions

Comments

    Leave a Comment

  1. jp says

    So what happens if you are charged with Reverse Domain Name Hijacking anyway. Any consequences to that, or do they just refuse to take any futher UDRP cases for you after that?

  2. Andrew says

    jp – nothing and no. There are really no consequences, except that future panel could consider it when reviewing a new case.

    Hopefully this will change some day.

  3. Steve M says

    …and in other news, World2Work has filed lawsuit against Donald Trump in attempt to grab all the vacant land and improved properties he owns because, quote:

    “We should not be forced to pay the inflated fees that Mr. Trump routinely charges for warehoused land which he has never bothered to use or develop; or properties which he has not put to their highest and best use.”

  4. MJ says

    Enom is now authorized to handle the “business of .tv premium domains.” And they are charging outrageous yearly renewal fees for names dubbed “premium.”

    Sky high yearly renewal fees for Fired.tv are most likely the reason for W2W wanting the normally priced .com version.

Domain Name Wire | Domain Name News
%d bloggers like this: