Domain Name Wire » VeriSign

VeriSign Swings to Profit in Q3, Domain Name Base up 6%

Andrew Allemann — Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:09:10 +0000

VeriSign reports earnings and domain growth.

VeriSign, which manages the registry for .com and .net domain names, reported a profitable third quarter. The company earned $53.6 million in the quarter, compared to a loss of $201.1 million in the same quarter in 2008.

VeriSign has divested a number of businesses lately, and is focusing on its core businesses, which includes domain registry. At the end of the quarter VeriSign had 94.9 million domains registered in the domain base for .com and .net, which is most of the company’s registry business.

The company has what amounts to a monopoly on .com and .net domain registrations, although a lawsuit challenging that monopoly is working its way through the courts.

VeriSign opted not to raise rates on .com and .net domain names this year. This is the first year in its current contract with ICANN that it has not levied the maximum increase of 7% on .com and 10% on .net. This is likely due to political pressures more than the stagnating economy.

Review and rate domain name parking companies at Parking Judge.

VeriSign Supports New TLDs? Of Course it Does.

Andrew Allemann — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 15:40:14 +0000

VeriSign says it supports new top level domains, which shouldn’t come as a surprise.

Chuck Gomes, VP of Policy and Compliance, Naming and Directory Services at VeriSign, wrote a post at CircleID about his company’s support of new top level domain names. This really shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone in the industry for many reasons:

1. New top level domains won’t erode demand for .com, which VeriSign manages. .Com will remain king.

2. VeriSign will make money as a back end registry for new top level domains. Gomes makes this clear in his post:

For registries—like VeriSign—that offer backend services to other registries, the new domain round represents a significant business opportunity. VeriSign is already in talks with several prospective operators of new domains and intends to engage actively in the emerging backend services market.

Gomes also says VeriSign is working to make sure that the applicant guidelines require TLD operators to have the financial wherewithal to ensure a successful rollout of new TLDs:

Given the importance of the registry function, it is also critical that new registries start from a position of financial stability and have clear mechanisms in place to protect registrants in the event of unforeseen events.

This, of course, plays to the favor of VeriSign since it has a big balance sheet.

One of the challenges VeriSign faces with new TLDs is that many other registry providers will undercut it on pricing. That’s because the true cost of running a registry like .com is less than a dollar a domain. But if it offers registry services for that little — like some of its competitors may — then people will call on it to lower .com prices (currently close to $7 per domain).

With .com registration growth slowing, VeriSign needs the short term lift of new top level domains.

3. New TLDs may remove price caps from VeriSign’s management of .com and .net. Gome doesn’t mention this in his post, but I will.

Review and rate domain name parking companies at Parking Judge.

Latest Top Level Domain Guidebook Allows .Com Prices to Skyrocket

Andrew Allemann — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:36:47 +0000

New draft guidebook doesn’t adequately address concerns that VeriSign could hike .com registration prices.

Over the weekend, ICANN released its latest New gTLD Applicant Guidebook with guidelines for the introduction of new top level domain names such as .eco and .shop. Unfortunately, the guidebook still holds a time bomb for owners of existing domain names, such as .com domains, that could force them to pay massive renewal fees for their domains.

What the guidebook allows: Registry operators for new TLDs can essentially choose whatever price they want to offer domain registrations. They must provide 30 days notice of price increases for new registrations and 180 days notice for renewal price increases. Domain owners would then be able to renew their domains for up to ten years at current prices.

How this could be applied to existing domains, such as .com: Existing registrants of domains such as .com mostly don’t care about pricing mechanisms for new top level domain names. The problem is that registry operators for existing domain names have a clause in their agreements with ICANN that says other registry agreements won’t include more favorable terms to other registries than their own contract. This means that VeriSign could push to remove pricing controls on .com domains, making them similar to new top level domain names.

Then they could announce variable pricing and massive price hikes, such as charging Google a billion dollars to renew Google.com. Google could renew at current prices for ten years, and then get hit with a big bill in the 11th year.

This violates an implicit guarantee: This isn’t fair to current domain owners, who registered their domains with the implicit guarantee that ICANN would manage registry contracts in a competitive manner. In other words, they would competitively bid registry contracts based, in large part, on the price registries would charge for their services.

ICANN isn’t listening. So far, people opposed to new TLD pricing have been fighting to restrict pricing in the new agreements. Although almost all comments provided to ICANN about pricing recommend price controls, it is becoming clear that ICANN does not intend to follow the wishes of the broader community, and is instead beholden to the registry operators who will profit from such pricing schemes.

What should be done: That’s OK for new domains, but violates the trust of existing domain owners. The battlefield should be moved to a different solution: force operators of existing TLDs, such as .com, .net, .org, .biz, and .info, to sign an updated registry agreement that adds an exclusion to the “most favored nation” clause. This exception would exclude pricing controls of other registry agreements from being applied to existing registry agreements.

Review and rate domain name parking companies at Parking Judge.

Domain Name Companies Spend $2M Lobbying Washington

Andrew Allemann — Wed, 05 Aug 2009 15:48:15 +0000

Analysis shows over $2M spent in first half of year on lobbying.

Domain name related companies continue to spend millions of dollars lobbying representatives in Washington, a study by Domain Name Wire shows. The analysis used public records filed with the U.S. Senate to calculate lobbying expenses by domain name companies and other companies regarding domain name issues.

By far the biggest spender is VeriSign (NASDAQ: VRSN), which spent $1.4M in the first half of 2009 on “Domain Name Addressing, Data legislation, Authentication Internet Content Legislation, Internet taxation, Internet e-mail legislation, e-commerce, pfishing legislation (sic)“. However, this number is down from last year when the company spent nearly $3.8M for the full year.

The next biggest lobbying force on Capitol Hill is GoDaddy, which spent $344,000 during the first half of the year. GoDaddy is trying to influence a number of issues, ranging from new gTLDs, the ICANN Joint Project Agreement, targeted online advertising, trademarks and copyrights, patent reform, and whois database privacy.

GoDaddy also formed a lobbying organization called “Internet Domain Name Registrars Coalition” along with Network Solutions and Oversee.net (Moniker) this year. (Update: Oversee.net is no longer a member of this group.)

With a number of big spenders trying to influence internet governance policy, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) is also involved. The non-profit spent $120,000 so far this year for “Internet governance issues including new gTLDs, consumer protection and domain name competition, security and spam, independence from UN/ITU/government capture, post-JPA cooperation with USG, cybersecurity and accountability/transparency. Policies regarding the oversight of Internet’s naming and numbering systems. S.773, Cybersecurity Act of 2009.”

Register.com spent $50,000 to influence “Legislation to authorize the Small Business Administration to assist unemployed individiauls start on-line businesses”. Demand Media spent $60,000 while its eNom division spent $40,000 to lobby about new generic top level domains. Neustar, registry for .biz and .us, chipped in $100,000 for FCC nominations and ICANN issues, while Network Solutions spent $20,000.

Coalition Against Domain Name Abuse (CADNA) and Internet Commerce Association (ICA) continue to invest in Washington. CADNA spent $60,000 to tackle issues related to cybersquatting and ICANN. Some of CADNA’s members also do their own domain name lobbying, including Intercontinental Hotels Group. ICA pulled back this year, spending less than $5,000 each quarter on lobbying.

Other organizations also spent part of their lobbying budget on domain name issues, including HP and United States Chamber of Commerce.

Review and rate domain name parking companies at Parking Judge.

Most Domain Stocks Down in First Half of 2009

Andrew Allemann — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 01:52:52 +0000

Domain stocks fail to keep up with broader technology index.

The NASDAQ was up 16% in the first half of 2009, but the rally didn’t extend to most domain name companies. Here’s a look at how they fared.

The Winners

Tucows (AMEX: TCX) jumped 27% to 42 cents a share at the close on June 30, 2009. The company stabilized over the period, but the stock jump was aided by aggressive stock buybacks.

AdLINK (DUS: LKI), the parent company of Sedo, saw its price increase in line with the broader tech market at 16%. It closed June 30 at $3.69 a share.

The Losers

Marchex (MCHX) continues its slide, down 42% on the year. The stock closed the first half at $3.39. It was only a few years ago that this stock traded over $20 a share.

Live Current (OTCbb: LIVC) fell 24% from 37 cents to 28 cents per share. The stock traded at over $3.00 per share in early 2008. The company is liquidating domain names to raise capital.

Dark Blue Sea (ASX:DBS) fell to 15 cents per share, down 2 pennies for the year. The stock is thinly traded. The company just issued profit guidance for 2008/09, saying profits would come in at about $1M AUS compared to nearly $4M AUS the prior year.

VeriSign (NASDAQ: VRSN) was doing well until a court decision threw its monopoly of .com domain names into a shadow of doubt. The stock is down 3% for the year.

Review and rate domain name parking companies at Parking Judge.

Will VeriSign Hold Domain Name Prices Steady this Year?

Andrew Allemann — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:54:57 +0000

With significant bad publicity, a negative court decision, and a watchful eye in Washington, will VeriSign not invoke its full 7% .com price increase this year?

For the past two years, .com and .net registry VeriSign (NASDAQ: VRSN) has increased prices on .com domain names 7% and .net 10%, the maximum allowed under its contract with ICANN. The .com contract allows VeriSign (NASDAQ: VRSN) to increase .com fees 7% per year for four years of each six year term in its agreement. The assumption has always been that it would max out the increases during the first four years of the contract, which would result in the maximum financial benefit.

But that may change. So far this year VeriSign hasn’t announced a price increase, and it is required to give a six month notice of an increase. During VeriSign’s first quarter conference call, President and COO Mark McLaughlin said:

So far we’ve taken two of these increases. And the patentees’ have been thoughtful about the timing of the increases, and I think we should be continuing to do so particularly in life as the impact of an increase could have on sales in this weak economy, as well as some uncertainty in the multiple constituencies that are involved in this industry.

I think VeriSign is going to hold off on increasing prices until next year mainly for political reasons.

Raising prices this year will be politically insatiable. VeriSign may go through a tough antitrust battle thanks to an appeals court ruling last week. It doesn’t want to look greedy in the process.

It is also dealing with Washington this time around. VeriSign was on Capitol Hill last week, sitting right next to ICANN CEO Paul Twomey, testifying about the future of ICANN. The witnesses were asked about the transparency of VeriSign’s current contract. Twomey’s defensive experience as a witness was tough. I doubt VeriSign wants to sit in a special hearing about its price increases. They would be hard to justify.

Finally, Twomey is on his way out and a yet-to-be-determined replacement is on his or her way in. It makes sense to establish a good relationship with that CEO prior to announcing a price increase.

I don’t expect VeriSign to introduce a price increase of less than 7% this year as a solution. The contract seems to read that a 3% increase this year would strike out one of the 7% increases. In other words, VeriSign can’t make it up on the back end. Only if VeriSign calculated that the compounding of a smaller than 7% increase early on was better than a 7% increase later would it do it.

VeriSign’s stock is down about 8.5% this morning, no doubt partly due to the unfavorable court decision last week. To the extent that analysts have already baked in 7% increases in the first five years, the stock could come under more pressure.

Review and rate domain name parking companies at Parking Judge.

Domain Name Wire » VeriSign

VeriSign Swings to Profit in Q3, Domain Name Base up 6%

VeriSign Supports New TLDs? Of Course it Does.

Latest Top Level Domain Guidebook Allows .Com Prices to Skyrocket

Domain Name Companies Spend $2M Lobbying Washington

Most Domain Stocks Down in First Half of 2009

Top Domain Name News Stories of June 2009

Will VeriSign Hold Domain Name Prices Steady this Year?