Displaying posts tagged under "icann"
Victims of terrorism want to be paid (in part) with country code top level domain names.
ICANN has responded to the U.S. federal court in the District of Columbia, arguing that ccTLDs (country Code top level domain names, e.g. .ca and .de) are not property and can’t be awarded to plaintiffs in a case involving terrorism.
Plaintiffs in Jenny Rubin, et al vs. The Islamic Republic of Iran, et al, say they are victims of terrorism from Iran, Syria and North Korea, and want control of country codes for each country (.IR, .SY, and .KP plus a couple IDN versions).
ICANN’s Motion to Quash argues that “country code Top-Level Domains (ccTLD) are part of a single, global interoperable Internet which ICANN serves to help maintain…ccTLD’s are not property, and are not ‘owned’ or ‘possessed’ by anyone including ICANN, and therefore cannot be seized in a lawsuit.”
ICANN’s general response was predictable.
Make no mistake — a ruling to the contrary would be devastating for the domain name system. One of the biggest threats to web is a splintering of the internet caused by governments upset that the U.S. government has too much control over the internet.
That’s a big part of the reason the U.S. government plans to end its role in the IANA contract for name delegation. It bothers other governments that the U.S. government has a sort of “veto power”.
While few people may be sympathetic to the three countries at issue, taking over their ccTLDs would be a horrible precedent that would throw the entire internet ecosystem into disarray.
It’s worth noting that gTLDs are a different matter. They are being treated like property and I wouldn’t be surprised to see them used as payment to settle legal issues in the future.
Domain Registry of America hits a wall.
ICANN has finally managed to suspend a scourge of the domain name registration business, Brandon Gray Internet Services (dba NameJuice.com).
You might not know the company by that name, but if you own domain names then you’ve likely received postal mailings from Domain Registry of America (DROA). The deceptive notices trick people into thinking they need to renew their domain name by responding to the notice. Doing so results in a transfer of the domain name to Brandon Gray registrar…and the pricetag is hefty.
The company has been doing this for over a decade. Register.com sued the company way back in 2002.
Many people in the ICANN community have been begging ICANN to take action for years. So why now?
For all its faults, you can credit the 2013 Registrar Accreditation Agreement for this one.
The 2013 RAA placed stricter controls on registrars as it relates to resellers. Accredited registrars can no longer turn a blind eye to activities undertaken by their resellers (or to hide behind resellers, as may be the case). This includes resellers undertaking deceptive advertising practices.
ICANN is also questioning (pdf) how the company obtained mailing addresses for so many domain name registrants. (In other words, it scraped whois to get the records).
The registrar is immediately suspended (although it hasn’t updated its website to reflect this) and may be terminated soon. ICANN sent a breach notice (pdf) along with the suspension notice. It has onerous requirements to cure the breach, including providing details behind all of its marketing activities.
Verification requirement ensnares hundreds of thousands of domain names.
One of the requirements for domain name registrars under the 2013 Registrar Accreditation Agreement is that they must verify the contact details of registrants.
Most registrars are fulfilling this requirement by sending an email to registrants asking them to click a link to confirm. Registrars must suspend domain names if owners don’t verify their information.
We’ve had one-off examples of domain names being suspended due to this requirement. Now we have hard numbers: at least 800,000 domains have been suspended since January 1.
Speaking at the Registrar Stakeholders Group meeting with ICANN’s Board in London today, Tucows CEO Elliot Noss said that number was collected from domain registrars that have about 75% of all registrations. He suspects the suspension ratio will be higher for registrars not included in the total because more of them are in parts of the world where it’s harder to verify.
Noss drew a parallel between the verification requirement (which only hurts good actors and doesn’t harm bad actors) and efforts underway to change whois. He asked ICANN’s board what problem it is trying to solve with the whois change.
166 page report describes plan to completely scrap WHOIS as we know it.
Last year I wrote about a plan to scrap Whois as we know it and replace it with a new Registration Directory Service (RDS).
The initial proposal, created by an ICANN working group, was rather complicated and 49 pages long.
Now the Expert Working Group has issued its final report. It weighs in at 166 pages and is sure to be a hot topic at the upcoming ICANN meeting in London.
I read the executive summary and started wading deep into the report. It’s really long. It’s really complicated. The nuance will be debated for many years before anything like what is proposed is enacted.
Rather than get into the weeds, here’s my 30,000 foot view.
The proposal takes what is a very simple, yet somewhat flawed, system. It considers the competing demands of registrants, law enforcement, intellectual property interests…and creates an extremely complicated system. A system that will certainly have unintended or unanticipated consequences.
The report’s authors suggest that the proposal needs to be accepted in whole. Changing an item here or there will make the whole point of it crumble.
This reminds me a bit of plans to cut the debt in the U.S. A group gets together, comes up with a plan to accomplish the goal and says this needs to be all or nothing.
But of course it’s never all or nothing. Interests get involved, cut out the meat of it, and you’re left with something that doesn’t accomplish the original goal.
That’s what’s going to happen here.
If you care about Whois, you should read this introductory blog post and take a look at the report.
Grab a big cup of coffee before you get started.
First of many planned new top level domain name auctions to take place next week.
It’s a last resort, and it kicks of next week.
ICANN will hold its first new top level domain name auction next week to settle the contention set for .信息, which roughly translates to “information”.
Afilias, the registry behind .info, will bid against Beijing Tele-info Network Technology Co., Ltd. for the name.
At least seven auctions were originally scheduled to take place next week, but most were postponed. Auctions can be postponed by mutual agreement of both parties or if any applicant in the contention set wants to wait for the finalized framework for handling name collisions.
I suspect a lot of contention sets will be resolved at the last minute outside of ICANN’s auctions. Some applicants have shied away from private resolution because they don’t want to pay off their competitors, but there are ways to do it without creating bad precedent.