Domain Name Wire

Domain Name Wire

  • Company Files Cybersquatting Claim Against Twitter Username

    1. BY - Jun 09, 2011
    2. Policy & Law
    3. 4 Comments

    Can a Twitter username be cybersquatting? One insurance company thinks so.

    TwitterHere’s an interesting lawsuit I just discovered that attempts to stretch the bounds of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection act.

    Insurance company Conventry First has filed a federal lawsuit (pdf) against whomever is using the CoventryFirst username on Twitter, i.e.

    But in addition to complaining about plain old trademark infringement, the company has thrown in a charge of cybersquatting for using

    Now, besides the issue that Coventry First is suggesting that having a trademark in a URL directory of your web site can be cybersquatting, it seems to me that in a way they could ensnare Twitter in this battle. After all, it’s Twitter’s domain name that Conventry is considering to be a violation of the anti-cybersquatting act.

    The lawsuit does not demand that the @coventryfirst username be transferred to Conventry First.

    Just for kicks, I’m going to make this post’s URL include coventry-first.

  • See also:

    * How To Twittersquat The Top 100 Brands
    A call for the creation of the Uniform Username Dispute Resolution Policy.

  • John Berryhill says:

    June 9, 2011 at 7:29 pm

    I love the way she calls the full URL a “domain name” without the slightest clue that server path names have been considered before under the ACPA and not considered (for the obvious reasons) to be “domain names”.

    _Interactive Goods, Corporation v. A2Z Mobile Office_, No. 01-3590 (6th Cir., April 10, 2003) (“post-domain path of a URL (the sub-file directory). . . does not generally signify source (of goods or services). The post-domain path merely shows how the website’s information is organized within the host personal computer files.”)

    Leave it to Camille to try to re-invent that wheel.

  • TheFactory says:

    June 10, 2011 at 11:00 am

    This sounds like a job for Lulzsec!

  • Coventry First could easily be a church name anywhere in the country too. Lame dispute — just sour grapes that they were late to the Twitter party.

Leave a Reply