<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is a .Net Worth 10% of .Com?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2010/07/12/is-a-net-worth-10-of-com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/07/12/is-a-net-worth-10-of-com/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 20:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: End User</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/07/12/is-a-net-worth-10-of-com/comment-page-1/#comment-786452</link>
		<dc:creator>End User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 15:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=13197#comment-786452</guid>
		<description>You domain brokers make me sick.... pathetic middle-men who only drive up prices on domains that the rest of us would actually like to USE. You add no value to the product, or the industry, at all! You&#039;re just leeches - no better than ticket scalpers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You domain brokers make me sick&#8230;. pathetic middle-men who only drive up prices on domains that the rest of us would actually like to USE. You add no value to the product, or the industry, at all! You&#8217;re just leeches &#8211; no better than ticket scalpers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emma</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/07/12/is-a-net-worth-10-of-com/comment-page-1/#comment-653979</link>
		<dc:creator>Emma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 03:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=13197#comment-653979</guid>
		<description>Anyway, with the launch of .CO the time came for .COM to be overtaken, to make it look nothing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyway, with the launch of .CO the time came for .COM to be overtaken, to make it look nothing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huw</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/07/12/is-a-net-worth-10-of-com/comment-page-1/#comment-653882</link>
		<dc:creator>Huw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=13197#comment-653882</guid>
		<description>Also interesting to see how many of us are rooting for .NET&#039;s and rightly so :)

But I wouldn&#039;t give Estibot the time of day, never have, never will. When I get a lead from a user quoting an Estibot figure for one of my .NET&#039;s - I&#039;ll drop the lead there and then - it&#039;s a none starter - they&#039;ve already set the game for lowballers!

Estibot should rethink the method for &quot;their&quot; .NET valuation and it certainly shouldn&#039;t be a mere 10% of a .COM - absurd!..

Bottom line - Estibot is loosing people time and money! Same with Sedo&#039;s valuation system, obviously they want to set figures so they can sell more, and more efficiently..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also interesting to see how many of us are rooting for .NET&#8217;s and rightly so <img src='http://domainnamewire.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But I wouldn&#8217;t give Estibot the time of day, never have, never will. When I get a lead from a user quoting an Estibot figure for one of my .NET&#8217;s &#8211; I&#8217;ll drop the lead there and then &#8211; it&#8217;s a none starter &#8211; they&#8217;ve already set the game for lowballers!</p>
<p>Estibot should rethink the method for &#8220;their&#8221; .NET valuation and it certainly shouldn&#8217;t be a mere 10% of a .COM &#8211; absurd!..</p>
<p>Bottom line &#8211; Estibot is loosing people time and money! Same with Sedo&#8217;s valuation system, obviously they want to set figures so they can sell more, and more efficiently..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gpmgroup</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/07/12/is-a-net-worth-10-of-com/comment-page-1/#comment-653877</link>
		<dc:creator>gpmgroup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 23:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=13197#comment-653877</guid>
		<description>@ Robert

The value .com has over other extensions is it is the natural first guess or assumption of many people especially in the US, in other countries like the UK the ccTLD .co.uk is often guessed and appended a similar amount to .com. 

While people guessing the generic + .com provides a steady revenue stream for PPC as a proportion of a fully developed website this type in traffic is tiny compared with traffic from bookmarks, links and search engines. And while this loss of traffic isnâ€™t ideal in the overall scheme of things itâ€™s not really a big deal for a fully developed website.  Further this loss of traffic can easily be minimized by branding (logoâ€™s etc.) of the website on the cityname.info rather than just cityname. 

Whether the value of the .info passes the parked .com will depend on several factors

Once any site is developed its value comes from the revenue it provides rather than the potential value (times the probability of a sale) domainers are looking for/valuing at.

The percentage of traffic coming from direct type ins varies by keyword for example it is more important for keywords offering high value transactions like â€œloansâ€ and â€œyachtsâ€. Cities are somewhat different in that people are not looking to transact an actual â€œcityâ€ but rather find out information about something in or from the city â€“ therefore each visitor has a less likely chance of converting a quick sale of tangible goods and the problem shifts more to one of visitor retention and repeat visits hence the need for compelling content and a great brand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Robert</p>
<p>The value .com has over other extensions is it is the natural first guess or assumption of many people especially in the US, in other countries like the UK the ccTLD .co.uk is often guessed and appended a similar amount to .com. </p>
<p>While people guessing the generic + .com provides a steady revenue stream for PPC as a proportion of a fully developed website this type in traffic is tiny compared with traffic from bookmarks, links and search engines. And while this loss of traffic isnâ€™t ideal in the overall scheme of things itâ€™s not really a big deal for a fully developed website.  Further this loss of traffic can easily be minimized by branding (logoâ€™s etc.) of the website on the cityname.info rather than just cityname. </p>
<p>Whether the value of the .info passes the parked .com will depend on several factors</p>
<p>Once any site is developed its value comes from the revenue it provides rather than the potential value (times the probability of a sale) domainers are looking for/valuing at.</p>
<p>The percentage of traffic coming from direct type ins varies by keyword for example it is more important for keywords offering high value transactions like â€œloansâ€ and â€œyachtsâ€. Cities are somewhat different in that people are not looking to transact an actual â€œcityâ€ but rather find out information about something in or from the city â€“ therefore each visitor has a less likely chance of converting a quick sale of tangible goods and the problem shifts more to one of visitor retention and repeat visits hence the need for compelling content and a great brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Dunn</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/07/12/is-a-net-worth-10-of-com/comment-page-1/#comment-653831</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Dunn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=13197#comment-653831</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s amazing to see how many people here who are actually trying to define a theory

There is no formula and will never be - every sale is unique</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s amazing to see how many people here who are actually trying to define a theory</p>
<p>There is no formula and will never be &#8211; every sale is unique</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Huw</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/07/12/is-a-net-worth-10-of-com/comment-page-1/#comment-653829</link>
		<dc:creator>Huw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 22:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=13197#comment-653829</guid>
		<description>Just noticed this in Sedo&#039;s newsletter today from Tim Schumacher:

PengYou.com sold - $100,000
PengYou.net sold - $100,000

Looks like the .net is worth as much as the .com there..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just noticed this in Sedo&#8217;s newsletter today from Tim Schumacher:</p>
<p>PengYou.com sold &#8211; $100,000<br />
PengYou.net sold &#8211; $100,000</p>
<p>Looks like the .net is worth as much as the .com there..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: "The Swedish"</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/07/12/is-a-net-worth-10-of-com/comment-page-1/#comment-653744</link>
		<dc:creator>"The Swedish"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 19:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=13197#comment-653744</guid>
		<description>Hello
Robert, you have two very interesting questions. Maybe a pro can give you (us) some comments.
Lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello<br />
Robert, you have two very interesting questions. Maybe a pro can give you (us) some comments.<br />
Lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

