<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Coming Fall in Domain Name Values</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2010/06/11/the-coming-fall-in-domain-name-values/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/06/11/the-coming-fall-in-domain-name-values/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:34:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/06/11/the-coming-fall-in-domain-name-values/comment-page-1/#comment-637758</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=12565#comment-637758</guid>
		<description>@ Aussie Guy - why would that make any difference?  We say the same thing about .com here in the U.S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Aussie Guy &#8211; why would that make any difference?  We say the same thing about .com here in the U.S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aussie Guy</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/06/11/the-coming-fall-in-domain-name-values/comment-page-1/#comment-637613</link>
		<dc:creator>Aussie Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 06:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=12565#comment-637613</guid>
		<description>A lot of the discussion on the new gTLDs is US centric. Outside the US, it will not make nearly the same splash. In most countries the ccTLD is king, even for brands with a strong .com. For example, here in Australia I read last week that over 85% of visitors to Google go to google.com.au and less than 15% to google.com.  People prefer to buy (and type in) local. No amount of .cars or .sport is going to overthrow the preference for cars.com.au or sport.com.au here, and I bet it will be the same for .co.uk and .de and most other countries outside the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of the discussion on the new gTLDs is US centric. Outside the US, it will not make nearly the same splash. In most countries the ccTLD is king, even for brands with a strong .com. For example, here in Australia I read last week that over 85% of visitors to Google go to google.com.au and less than 15% to google.com.  People prefer to buy (and type in) local. No amount of .cars or .sport is going to overthrow the preference for cars.com.au or sport.com.au here, and I bet it will be the same for .co.uk and .de and most other countries outside the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Fleming</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/06/11/the-coming-fall-in-domain-name-values/comment-page-1/#comment-637346</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Fleming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 19:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=12565#comment-637346</guid>
		<description>The .NAME TLD can be handy for .NAME related
topics.

Example:
http://ZOOM.NAME

Even though a ZOOM.NAME. is not a domain name
it is handy to have a domain name to link to
the info. A ZOOM.NAME. is always 10 symbols
with no spaces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The .NAME TLD can be handy for .NAME related<br />
topics.</p>
<p>Example:<br />
<a href="http://ZOOM.NAME" rel="nofollow">http://ZOOM.NAME</a></p>
<p>Even though a ZOOM.NAME. is not a domain name<br />
it is handy to have a domain name to link to<br />
the info. A ZOOM.NAME. is always 10 symbols<br />
with no spaces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/06/11/the-coming-fall-in-domain-name-values/comment-page-1/#comment-636985</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 03:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=12565#comment-636985</guid>
		<description>A lot of people buying .net or .org keyword domains are doing so to gain search engine advantages. To the extent that new TLDs are less favored in the engines (as .info, .biz, and other &quot;exotic&quot; gTLDs are today), they won&#039;t represent an equivalent alternative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of people buying .net or .org keyword domains are doing so to gain search engine advantages. To the extent that new TLDs are less favored in the engines (as .info, .biz, and other &#8220;exotic&#8221; gTLDs are today), they won&#8217;t represent an equivalent alternative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/06/11/the-coming-fall-in-domain-name-values/comment-page-1/#comment-636922</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 01:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=12565#comment-636922</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a reason those .info and .biz domains are blocked by yahoo, and why new ones will be too: there&#039;s no reason they should get actual type-in direct search traffic.

As for domainers snapping up the same generic terms in all TLDs...There&#039;s still a supply and demand issue.  Right now you might pay $5,000 for save.info because you only have a few choice.  But if there are 100 generic new TLDs, do you really think domainers will pay $500,000 to snap up all of the save.tld?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a reason those .info and .biz domains are blocked by yahoo, and why new ones will be too: there&#8217;s no reason they should get actual type-in direct search traffic.</p>
<p>As for domainers snapping up the same generic terms in all TLDs&#8230;There&#8217;s still a supply and demand issue.  Right now you might pay $5,000 for save.info because you only have a few choice.  But if there are 100 generic new TLDs, do you really think domainers will pay $500,000 to snap up all of the save.tld?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Fleming</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/06/11/the-coming-fall-in-domain-name-values/comment-page-1/#comment-636679</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Fleming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=12565#comment-636679</guid>
		<description>You may want to exclude 4-Letter .COM names from your calculations.

The 4-Letter .COM names have a special role
in the &quot;new&quot; DNS. Something was needed that
people could remember to jump-start the new
system.

They are sort of like NASDQ Stock Symbols.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may want to exclude 4-Letter .COM names from your calculations.</p>
<p>The 4-Letter .COM names have a special role<br />
in the &#8220;new&#8221; DNS. Something was needed that<br />
people could remember to jump-start the new<br />
system.</p>
<p>They are sort of like NASDQ Stock Symbols.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerry</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/06/11/the-coming-fall-in-domain-name-values/comment-page-1/#comment-636426</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 01:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=12565#comment-636426</guid>
		<description>new gTLDs will be useless as subdomain plays but are pure danger to verisign/.com leadership, prestige imho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>new gTLDs will be useless as subdomain plays but are pure danger to verisign/.com leadership, prestige imho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

