<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: eNom Announces .Com Price Increases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2010/05/19/enom-announces-com-price-increases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/05/19/enom-announces-com-price-increases/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:56:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/05/19/enom-announces-com-price-increases/comment-page-1/#comment-650965</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 16:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=12408#comment-650965</guid>
		<description>For anyone who didn&#039;t catch it, Enom also raised the prices for .us, .org, and .biz for which there was no registry price increase. This is quite a sleazy move by Enom. I&#039;m not surprised though, given their acquirethisname.com front for selling their clients&#039; expired domain names at a hugely inflated cost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For anyone who didn&#8217;t catch it, Enom also raised the prices for .us, .org, and .biz for which there was no registry price increase. This is quite a sleazy move by Enom. I&#8217;m not surprised though, given their acquirethisname.com front for selling their clients&#8217; expired domain names at a hugely inflated cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neha</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/05/19/enom-announces-com-price-increases/comment-page-1/#comment-634177</link>
		<dc:creator>Neha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 15:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=12408#comment-634177</guid>
		<description>Netlynx.com announce it too.

.com &gt;&gt; 8.25 - 9.49 USD ( from present 7.59 - 8.99 USD )

Almost 50 - 60 cent price increase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Netlynx.com announce it too.</p>
<p>.com &gt;&gt; 8.25 &#8211; 9.49 USD ( from present 7.59 &#8211; 8.99 USD )</p>
<p>Almost 50 &#8211; 60 cent price increase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MCA</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/05/19/enom-announces-com-price-increases/comment-page-1/#comment-626340</link>
		<dc:creator>MCA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 10:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=12408#comment-626340</guid>
		<description>just got a mail from dynadot telling abt increase in price too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just got a mail from dynadot telling abt increase in price too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/05/19/enom-announces-com-price-increases/comment-page-1/#comment-626051</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 18:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=12408#comment-626051</guid>
		<description>The way I look at it, it&#039;s not a bad thing due to the reason that there will be less competition out there to grab good generic domains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The way I look at it, it&#8217;s not a bad thing due to the reason that there will be less competition out there to grab good generic domains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

