Comments on: New York Times Wins Case Against Typosquatter http://domainnamewire.com/2010/04/28/new-york-times-wins-case-against-typosquatter/ Domain Name Industry News and Views Sat, 26 May 2012 20:25:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Today's comments http://domainnamewire.com/2010/04/28/new-york-times-wins-case-against-typosquatter/comment-page-1/#comment-610328 Today's comments Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:53:12 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/?p=12051#comment-610328 A couple interesting observations jump out at me about this case. 1. Why did the New York Times wait 8-9 yrs to go after them/him? 2. Why is the cybersquatter using WeDirect/USSeek/EuroSeek located in San Jose, CA? How can the cybersquatter make any serious revenue using a small group like WeDirect? Is WeDirect connected to this group? Why use a company in the U.S. which can easily be subpoenaed? A couple interesting observations jump out at me about this case.

1. Why did the New York Times wait 8-9 yrs to go after them/him?

2. Why is the cybersquatter using WeDirect/USSeek/EuroSeek located in San Jose, CA?
How can the cybersquatter make any serious revenue using a small group like WeDirect?
Is WeDirect connected to this group?
Why use a company in the U.S. which can easily be subpoenaed?

]]>