<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ICANN Warns 4 Registrars, Gives 15 Days Notice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2010/04/18/icann-warns-4-registrars-gives-15-days-notice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/04/18/icann-warns-4-registrars-gives-15-days-notice/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:49:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: caroline</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/04/18/icann-warns-4-registrars-gives-15-days-notice/comment-page-1/#comment-607107</link>
		<dc:creator>caroline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=11857#comment-607107</guid>
		<description>I was away in India when my .com name expired and someone bought it and tried to sell it to me for a lot of money
the name afinitec is a brand name registered do I have any recourse against this person</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was away in India when my .com name expired and someone bought it and tried to sell it to me for a lot of money<br />
the name afinitec is a brand name registered do I have any recourse against this person</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/04/18/icann-warns-4-registrars-gives-15-days-notice/comment-page-1/#comment-602795</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 02:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=11857#comment-602795</guid>
		<description>ICANN is no one to be pointing fingers.  That has to be the slimiest operation going next to   DirectNIC.com    Please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ICANN is no one to be pointing fingers.  That has to be the slimiest operation going next to   DirectNIC.com    Please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Berryhil</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/04/18/icann-warns-4-registrars-gives-15-days-notice/comment-page-1/#comment-601932</link>
		<dc:creator>John Berryhil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 03:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=11857#comment-601932</guid>
		<description>The data escrow requirement is spelled out here:

http://www.icann.org/en/nsi/icann-raa-04nov99.htm#II-I

What has happened is that a few years ago, it was advantageous for a single entity to control multiple registrars for dropcatching.   With the development of &quot;transfer fulfillment&quot; systems like SnapNames and NameJet, the incidence of registry deletion of valuable names dramatically decreased. 

As a consequence, a lot of &quot;spare&quot; registrars were left over with no particular use.  At the same time, some domain registrants were dissatisfied with the lopsided contracts offered by retail registrars.  This created a ready market to sell the excess registrar entities.   

So, what you have are a certain number of registrars operating without detailed familiarity of the ICANN operating requirements for registrars.  The harm potential is low, so long as they aren&#039;t offering retail registration services for others.   Typically, they need a quick primer and to sign up with Iron Mountain, which is contracted by ICANN to collect and escrow registrar data (under a contract that is not published by ICANN, oddly enough).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The data escrow requirement is spelled out here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.icann.org/en/nsi/icann-raa-04nov99.htm#II-I" rel="nofollow">http://www.icann.org/en/nsi/icann-raa-04nov99.htm#II-I</a></p>
<p>What has happened is that a few years ago, it was advantageous for a single entity to control multiple registrars for dropcatching.   With the development of &#8220;transfer fulfillment&#8221; systems like SnapNames and NameJet, the incidence of registry deletion of valuable names dramatically decreased. </p>
<p>As a consequence, a lot of &#8220;spare&#8221; registrars were left over with no particular use.  At the same time, some domain registrants were dissatisfied with the lopsided contracts offered by retail registrars.  This created a ready market to sell the excess registrar entities.   </p>
<p>So, what you have are a certain number of registrars operating without detailed familiarity of the ICANN operating requirements for registrars.  The harm potential is low, so long as they aren&#8217;t offering retail registration services for others.   Typically, they need a quick primer and to sign up with Iron Mountain, which is contracted by ICANN to collect and escrow registrar data (under a contract that is not published by ICANN, oddly enough).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louise</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/04/18/icann-warns-4-registrars-gives-15-days-notice/comment-page-1/#comment-601820</link>
		<dc:creator>Louise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 01:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=11857#comment-601820</guid>
		<description>Andrew, Would you explain what &quot;escrow WhosIs information&quot; means?  Thanx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, Would you explain what &#8220;escrow WhosIs information&#8221; means?  Thanx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

