<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Peculiar UDRPs: Recent.net, Than.net, They.net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2010/03/07/peculiar-udrps-recent-net-than-net-they-net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/03/07/peculiar-udrps-recent-net-than-net-they-net/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:35:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Allegedly Stolen Domain Names Resold on Flippa - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/03/07/peculiar-udrps-recent-net-than-net-they-net/comment-page-1/#comment-583994</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Allegedly Stolen Domain Names Resold on Flippa - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 20:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=11128#comment-583994</guid>
		<description>[...] wrote about the case earlier this month, suggesting that the UDRP dispute must be over stolen domain names. UDRP is sometimes used to regain control of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] wrote about the case earlier this month, suggesting that the UDRP dispute must be over stolen domain names. UDRP is sometimes used to regain control of [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellie</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/03/07/peculiar-udrps-recent-net-than-net-they-net/comment-page-1/#comment-574556</link>
		<dc:creator>Kellie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=11128#comment-574556</guid>
		<description>Yep, I was offered these domains as well. Strongly considered it but with the &quot;too good to be true&quot; pricing and urgency it smelled off. Wouldn&#039;t be at all surprised to find that these had been stolen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, I was offered these domains as well. Strongly considered it but with the &#8220;too good to be true&#8221; pricing and urgency it smelled off. Wouldn&#8217;t be at all surprised to find that these had been stolen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FT</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/03/07/peculiar-udrps-recent-net-than-net-they-net/comment-page-1/#comment-574513</link>
		<dc:creator>FT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=11128#comment-574513</guid>
		<description>We were offered these names (plus a couple more) a few times from April - June 2009, from someone that appeared to be a Korean. Definitely smelled fishy then, and more so now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We were offered these names (plus a couple more) a few times from April &#8211; June 2009, from someone that appeared to be a Korean. Definitely smelled fishy then, and more so now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heaven</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/03/07/peculiar-udrps-recent-net-than-net-they-net/comment-page-1/#comment-574479</link>
		<dc:creator>heaven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=11128#comment-574479</guid>
		<description>seems a reverse domain hijacking</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seems a reverse domain hijacking</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

