Paris Loses another Geo Domain Case, But You Won’t Believe The Dissent…

Paris loses challenge to Paris.tv. A French arbitrator disagrees.

Paris Trademark FoolsVille de Paris — the City of Paris — has lost yet another domain name arbitration case.

At issue was Paris.tv. This isn’t the first time Paris has gone after this domain name. It sent two cease and desist letters to the owner of Paris.tv back in 2006. At that point, the owner of the domain name had enough and filed suit for declaratory relief under Lanham Act for Tortuous Interference with contract and defamation in the Southern District of New York. Paris then backtracked, suggesting the court had no jurisdiction over it.

Fast forward to 2009. After filing a number of UDRPs for domains including the word “Paris”, and getting sued in Texas court as a results, Paris went ahead and filed a UDRP against Paris.tv. It argued that it has a stylized trademark for “Paris”, and it has a video/TV segment on its Paris.fr web site, which might lead to confusion.

A three person panel found against Paris, ruling that Paris couldn’t rely on its stylized mark to go after anyone who uses a domain with “Paris” in it. Quite simply, the majority wrote “Complainant does not have exclusive world-wide rights to use the term [Paris].”

But what’s amazing is that one panelist dissented. And where is dissenting panelist Christiane Féral-Schuhl from? Yep. Paris, France. Once again, this dissent shows how laughable WIPO is as an institution. The fact that someone’s local ties to a city would cause them to go against ten years of UDRP principles is outrageous.

Not only did Féral-Schuhl find that the domain was confusingly similar to Paris’ mark, but also that the owner had no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name and it was registered and used in bad faith.

Further Reading:

  1. Paris Sues Paris.org Owner in French Court
  2. Paris still running away from reverse domain hijacking claim
  3. Paris Hilton Upset About Cybersquatters


Comments

  1. Belmassio
    February 23rd, 2010 | 1:23 pm

    That’s sickening a judge would vote that way.

  2. Kevin
    February 23rd, 2010 | 1:47 pm

    French have always been spineless cowards.

  3. February 23rd, 2010 | 1:51 pm

    I’d like to see Paris Hilton on Paris.tv but that’s just me.

    At the very least I hope there is never a domain conference in Paris. When will the crap stop and a way to punish the perps be in place. All domain bloggers should write about this…it may at least stop a few trips to Paris.

  4. February 23rd, 2010 | 1:57 pm

    @ Tom – interestingly, the panel did discuss that Paris.tv could just as likely be used by Paris Hilton.

  5. bernard
    February 23rd, 2010 | 2:08 pm

    Sure Paris wasn’t named after Paris.

    And Paris, Texas is the most famous city of the world holding that name… After Paris in Las Vegas.

    Hello from Paris

  6. bernard
    February 23rd, 2010 | 2:12 pm

    To be sold fore many many figures: paris.tv, but listen, no video from Paris, France.

    Lol, good luck!

  7. February 23rd, 2010 | 3:16 pm

    You couldn’t have asked for a better dissention on record. Her intentions are as obvious as when the USSR Olympic judges used to give the US athletes consistently low scores. It essentially disqualifies her argument.

  8. Paris Domain Meeting
    February 23rd, 2010 | 4:17 pm

    Quote -
    “At the very least I hope there is never a domain conference in Paris”

    There was a domain meeting in Paris in 2008.

    http://dnjournal.com/events/2008/domainer-meeting-preview.htm

  9. February 23rd, 2010 | 11:09 pm

    when these guys leave domain hijacking

  10. John Berryhill
    February 24th, 2010 | 12:58 pm
  11. Richard Meyer
    February 24th, 2010 | 2:21 pm

    John,
    If you keep winning the cases against Paris, they will not permit you to enter the country.

    Congratulations, Great job.

  12. February 24th, 2010 | 10:17 pm

    Great post, Andrew! The question is, when so many know if this issue, why isn’t something done to whip WIPO into shape, for heaven’s sake?

  13. April 3rd, 2010 | 7:21 pm

    [...] Paris Loses another Geo Domain Case, But You Won't Believe The Dissent… [...]

Leave a reply


Your comment will be deleted if: you use an invalid email address, you use a URL shortener for your web site link, your website link goes to a parked domain name, or your "name" is an advertisement keyword.


TOP