<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: .Co Domain Name is .Coming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2010/02/17/co-domain-name-is-coming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/02/17/co-domain-name-is-coming/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 20:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 13</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/02/17/co-domain-name-is-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-1439114</link>
		<dc:creator>13</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2011 17:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=10779#comment-1439114</guid>
		<description>UDRPtalk, sounds like you are just speaking for your own personal interest. Perhaps you have a lot of .com addresses and don&#039;t want anyone else to buy them up in the &quot;.co&quot; version, thereby taking some of your traffic. If you think about it, they may even give you more traffic at times. It&#039;s fine to be concerned if you own a lot of  .com addresses, but from a business standpoint, it also makes sense to go the route the .co people are going now and see where it takes them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UDRPtalk, sounds like you are just speaking for your own personal interest. Perhaps you have a lot of .com addresses and don&#8217;t want anyone else to buy them up in the &#8220;.co&#8221; version, thereby taking some of your traffic. If you think about it, they may even give you more traffic at times. It&#8217;s fine to be concerned if you own a lot of  .com addresses, but from a business standpoint, it also makes sense to go the route the .co people are going now and see where it takes them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RN Salary</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/02/17/co-domain-name-is-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-1327842</link>
		<dc:creator>RN Salary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 03:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=10779#comment-1327842</guid>
		<description>.Co Domain Name is good ,i will use it.

thank for your information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.Co Domain Name is good ,i will use it.</p>
<p>thank for your information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damon</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/02/17/co-domain-name-is-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-835300</link>
		<dc:creator>Damon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 03:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=10779#comment-835300</guid>
		<description>Time will tell. In a few years it&#039;s very possible you will be eating your own words and looking like a fool.
With the right uptake, development and marketing it can overtake .NET in a few of years.
People tend to compare .CO to all the other failed ccTLD&#039;s, yet they forget a few key factors.
1.) treated as a global ccTLD by Google
2.) .co has been around in business names for over 150 years.
3.) .co is a shortener in a time when fast and easy is the key to success
4.) .co is being backed by industry giants and it has a marketing team behind it very different than other failed ccTLD&#039;s
5.) The Sedo .co domain auction had garbage names available (mostly). The ones that did sell sold at a perfect price for such a young (reinvented) ccTLD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time will tell. In a few years it&#8217;s very possible you will be eating your own words and looking like a fool.<br />
With the right uptake, development and marketing it can overtake .NET in a few of years.<br />
People tend to compare .CO to all the other failed ccTLD&#8217;s, yet they forget a few key factors.<br />
1.) treated as a global ccTLD by Google<br />
2.) .co has been around in business names for over 150 years.<br />
3.) .co is a shortener in a time when fast and easy is the key to success<br />
4.) .co is being backed by industry giants and it has a marketing team behind it very different than other failed ccTLD&#8217;s<br />
5.) The Sedo .co domain auction had garbage names available (mostly). The ones that did sell sold at a perfect price for such a young (reinvented) ccTLD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iamzoran</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/02/17/co-domain-name-is-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-750769</link>
		<dc:creator>iamzoran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 10:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=10779#comment-750769</guid>
		<description>I have read every comment. It all makes sense. HOWEVER, the marketing effort is speaking to me. My strategic sense informs me that .co will outstrip .com when it comes to small business. When I think of Facebook I think .com When i think NBC or CocaCola I think .com When I think Volcano Signs I think .co 

We&#039;ll see. The marketng is good. Maybe what will cary .co to success is the little guy not the â€œdomain communityâ€ that lives of the name investments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read every comment. It all makes sense. HOWEVER, the marketing effort is speaking to me. My strategic sense informs me that .co will outstrip .com when it comes to small business. When I think of Facebook I think .com When i think NBC or CocaCola I think .com When I think Volcano Signs I think .co </p>
<p>We&#8217;ll see. The marketng is good. Maybe what will cary .co to success is the little guy not the â€œdomain communityâ€ that lives of the name investments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .Co Domain Name is .Coming : Hysteroscopy.co</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/02/17/co-domain-name-is-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-692321</link>
		<dc:creator>.Co Domain Name is .Coming : Hysteroscopy.co</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 22:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=10779#comment-692321</guid>
		<description>[...] Source:&#160;domainnamewire [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] Source:&nbsp;domainnamewire [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/02/17/co-domain-name-is-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-661152</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=10779#comment-661152</guid>
		<description>Just typed business.co into Google with the response:
Did you mean: business.com  

Should answer the question</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just typed business.co into Google with the response:<br />
Did you mean: business.com  </p>
<p>Should answer the question</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freddie Fender</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/02/17/co-domain-name-is-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-659323</link>
		<dc:creator>Freddie Fender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=10779#comment-659323</guid>
		<description>The price they are asking for this is ridiculous .period

It is a .con</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The price they are asking for this is ridiculous .period</p>
<p>It is a .con</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

