<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T Should Sell Buzz.com to Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2010/02/09/att-should-sell-buzz-com-to-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/02/09/att-should-sell-buzz-com-to-google/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:50:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/02/09/att-should-sell-buzz-com-to-google/comment-page-1/#comment-568930</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 03:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=10672#comment-568930</guid>
		<description>@ Robert - I call in the coroner because of who&#039;s behind it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Robert &#8211; I call in the coroner because of who&#8217;s behind it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/02/09/att-should-sell-buzz-com-to-google/comment-page-1/#comment-568831</link>
		<dc:creator>robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 02:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=10672#comment-568831</guid>
		<description>At the time you wrote this, buzz.com was still in alpha, so it shouldn&#039;t surprise anyone that it wasn&#039;t exactly huge yet.

Now it&#039;s in beta, and invitation-only, I think. A little early to call in the coroner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the time you wrote this, buzz.com was still in alpha, so it shouldn&#8217;t surprise anyone that it wasn&#8217;t exactly huge yet.</p>
<p>Now it&#8217;s in beta, and invitation-only, I think. A little early to call in the coroner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/02/09/att-should-sell-buzz-com-to-google/comment-page-1/#comment-564578</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=10672#comment-564578</guid>
		<description>@ Joe B - no wonder I&#039;m getting a lot of search queries for buzz.com right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Joe B &#8211; no wonder I&#8217;m getting a lot of search queries for buzz.com right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe B.</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/02/09/att-should-sell-buzz-com-to-google/comment-page-1/#comment-564537</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 23:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=10672#comment-564537</guid>
		<description>&quot;AT&amp;T&#039;s Buzz.com Aims to Take a Bite Out of Yelp&quot; - January 28, 2010

http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/012810-atts-buzzcom-aims-to-take.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;AT&amp;T&#8217;s Buzz.com Aims to Take a Bite Out of Yelp&#8221; &#8211; January 28, 2010</p>
<p><a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/012810-atts-buzzcom-aims-to-take.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.networkworld.com/news/2010/012810-atts-buzzcom-aims-to-take.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chandan</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/02/09/att-should-sell-buzz-com-to-google/comment-page-1/#comment-555637</link>
		<dc:creator>chandan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=10672#comment-555637</guid>
		<description>why att should not be in social network ?  even we can see each webmaster is trying to setup social network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why att should not be in social network ?  even we can see each webmaster is trying to setup social network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Launch Google BUZZ &#124; Domain names, news and opinions</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/02/09/att-should-sell-buzz-com-to-google/comment-page-1/#comment-554243</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Launch Google BUZZ &#124; Domain names, news and opinions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 01:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=10672#comment-554243</guid>
		<description>[...] Interestingly, Buzz.com is owned by AT&amp;T. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] Interestingly, Buzz.com is owned by AT&amp;T. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

