<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Survey: Price, Security Most Important When Choosing Domain Registrar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2010/02/08/survey-price-security-most-important-when-choosing-domain-registrar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/02/08/survey-price-security-most-important-when-choosing-domain-registrar/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:15:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Investor</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/02/08/survey-price-security-most-important-when-choosing-domain-registrar/comment-page-1/#comment-554031</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 15:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=10565#comment-554031</guid>
		<description>Quote -
&quot;ICANN should require all major registrars to submit a proof of their financial stability.&quot;

#1.  All registrar applicants show financial capability when they apply for a new registrar (or ownership change).

#2.  Icann has gotten tough regarding Icann payments.  If a registrar has financial problems, it will show quickly because of the quarterly Icann payments.  Plus, I assume Verisign informs Icann when a registrar is a slow pay with the Verisign monthly bill. 

#3.  Icann has no interest or capability to monitor and micro-manage the daily internal operations of a 1,000 registrars. 

#4.  All registrars have to go through a renewal process every 5(?) years.  And, Icann have canceled some registrars during the renewal process.

#5.  The majority of the registrars make most of their revenue from other operations than selling/renewing domains. 
Most registrars make very little from new/renewed domains. 

Registrars main source of PROFIT.
Godaddy - TDNAM - Hosting - SSL
Enom - Namejet - DemandMedia
Fab. - ppc 
Moniker - Snapnames - DomainSponsor
Netsol - Namejet - hosting 
Name - ppc - selling domains
Reseller - ppc
Namescout - catching/re-auctioning domains
DirectNIC - ppc/Parked
Tucows - Namejet - ppc - other operations
Dotster - selling expired domains
Nameview - Hitfarm

The above registrars probably contain/manage/control 95% of all domains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote -<br />
&#8220;ICANN should require all major registrars to submit a proof of their financial stability.&#8221;</p>
<p>#1.  All registrar applicants show financial capability when they apply for a new registrar (or ownership change).</p>
<p>#2.  Icann has gotten tough regarding Icann payments.  If a registrar has financial problems, it will show quickly because of the quarterly Icann payments.  Plus, I assume Verisign informs Icann when a registrar is a slow pay with the Verisign monthly bill. </p>
<p>#3.  Icann has no interest or capability to monitor and micro-manage the daily internal operations of a 1,000 registrars. </p>
<p>#4.  All registrars have to go through a renewal process every 5(?) years.  And, Icann have canceled some registrars during the renewal process.</p>
<p>#5.  The majority of the registrars make most of their revenue from other operations than selling/renewing domains.<br />
Most registrars make very little from new/renewed domains. </p>
<p>Registrars main source of PROFIT.<br />
Godaddy &#8211; TDNAM &#8211; Hosting &#8211; SSL<br />
Enom &#8211; Namejet &#8211; DemandMedia<br />
Fab. &#8211; ppc<br />
Moniker &#8211; Snapnames &#8211; DomainSponsor<br />
Netsol &#8211; Namejet &#8211; hosting<br />
Name &#8211; ppc &#8211; selling domains<br />
Reseller &#8211; ppc<br />
Namescout &#8211; catching/re-auctioning domains<br />
DirectNIC &#8211; ppc/Parked<br />
Tucows &#8211; Namejet &#8211; ppc &#8211; other operations<br />
Dotster &#8211; selling expired domains<br />
Nameview &#8211; Hitfarm</p>
<p>The above registrars probably contain/manage/control 95% of all domains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mansour</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/02/08/survey-price-security-most-important-when-choosing-domain-registrar/comment-page-1/#comment-553754</link>
		<dc:creator>Mansour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 21:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=10565#comment-553754</guid>
		<description>Great Job Andrew
I can also say Price goes hand in hand with security.  We have witnessed, in the past, the collapse of RegisterFly.com who offered domain names for less than $7.00 and ended in insolvency. ICANN should require all major registrars to submit a proof of their financial stability.  Can you imaagine the mayhem on the Internet if one of the top five registrars went out of business?  There is no time for another Lehman Brothers or AIG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Job Andrew<br />
I can also say Price goes hand in hand with security.  We have witnessed, in the past, the collapse of RegisterFly.com who offered domain names for less than $7.00 and ended in insolvency. ICANN should require all major registrars to submit a proof of their financial stability.  Can you imaagine the mayhem on the Internet if one of the top five registrars went out of business?  There is no time for another Lehman Brothers or AIG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

