<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IBM Wants to Patent Semantic Web Tag Clouds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2010/02/04/ibm-wants-to-patent-semantic-web-tag-clouds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/02/04/ibm-wants-to-patent-semantic-web-tag-clouds/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 11:38:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/02/04/ibm-wants-to-patent-semantic-web-tag-clouds/comment-page-1/#comment-551644</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=10519#comment-551644</guid>
		<description>Rod,
How would someone use commontag.org? The concept seems nice but their site doesn&#039;t seem to be updated recently. Is the project making any progress?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rod,<br />
How would someone use commontag.org? The concept seems nice but their site doesn&#8217;t seem to be updated recently. Is the project making any progress?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod Petrovic</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/02/04/ibm-wants-to-patent-semantic-web-tag-clouds/comment-page-1/#comment-551276</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod Petrovic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 06:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=10519#comment-551276</guid>
		<description>Semantic tagging, as described by IBM, exists for several years now and is already implemented in a number of services. Pioneers were Faviki, Zigtag and Zemanta, to name a few. Last year, the joint effort by AdaptiveBlue, DERI, Faviki, Freebase, Yahoo!, Zemanta and Zigtag even managed to produce a standard called the Common Tag (http://commontag.org).

The fact that IBM, who had no role in these efforts so far, is trying to patent this idea makes me sick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Semantic tagging, as described by IBM, exists for several years now and is already implemented in a number of services. Pioneers were Faviki, Zigtag and Zemanta, to name a few. Last year, the joint effort by AdaptiveBlue, DERI, Faviki, Freebase, Yahoo!, Zemanta and Zigtag even managed to produce a standard called the Common Tag (<a href="http://commontag.org" rel="nofollow">http://commontag.org</a>).</p>
<p>The fact that IBM, who had no role in these efforts so far, is trying to patent this idea makes me sick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IBM Wants to Patent Semantic Web Tag Clouds &#171; Simply Semantics, LLC</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/02/04/ibm-wants-to-patent-semantic-web-tag-clouds/comment-page-1/#comment-551220</link>
		<dc:creator>IBM Wants to Patent Semantic Web Tag Clouds &#171; Simply Semantics, LLC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=10519#comment-551220</guid>
		<description>[...] The patent application includes a number of methods that can overcome the challenges of relating information in tags. (Source: Domain Name Wire) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] The patent application includes a number of methods that can overcome the challenges of relating information in tags. (Source: Domain Name Wire) [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Haastrup-Timmi</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/02/04/ibm-wants-to-patent-semantic-web-tag-clouds/comment-page-1/#comment-551211</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Haastrup-Timmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=10519#comment-551211</guid>
		<description>There are no limitations to how tags are phrased in our &quot;cloud&quot; on Lawyers Engineâ„¢. Check it out:

http://www.lawyersengine.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are no limitations to how tags are phrased in our &#8220;cloud&#8221; on Lawyers Engineâ„¢. Check it out:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawyersengine.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.lawyersengine.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chandan</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/02/04/ibm-wants-to-patent-semantic-web-tag-clouds/comment-page-1/#comment-550992</link>
		<dc:creator>chandan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=10519#comment-550992</guid>
		<description>wow what next  footer links too to patent ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow what next  footer links too to patent ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/02/04/ibm-wants-to-patent-semantic-web-tag-clouds/comment-page-1/#comment-550939</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=10519#comment-550939</guid>
		<description>Clearly, we don&#039;t need patents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly, we don&#8217;t need patents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

