<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roche, Lego, and Google File Most Domain Arbitration Cases in 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2010/01/19/roche-lego-and-google-file-most-domain-arbitration-cases-in-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/01/19/roche-lego-and-google-file-most-domain-arbitration-cases-in-2009/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:15:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Roche Loses Valium Domain Case - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/01/19/roche-lego-and-google-file-most-domain-arbitration-cases-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-548599</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Roche Loses Valium Domain Case - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=10155#comment-548599</guid>
		<description>[...] filed more domain disputes under UDRP last year than any other company, and it usually wins without contest. But in this case, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] filed more domain disputes under UDRP last year than any other company, and it usually wins without contest. But in this case, [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FCliff</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2010/01/19/roche-lego-and-google-file-most-domain-arbitration-cases-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-543624</link>
		<dc:creator>FCliff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 04:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=10155#comment-543624</guid>
		<description>I agree w/ these cases except for one AAA - Those domains they stole were generic! AAA is a generic term used for decades, it is ridiculous the UDRP panel awarded those domains to a auto insurance company. You know how scumbaggy those d-bags are? Seriously SCREW the UDRP panel, and the whole process of defining words in to &quot;we own the dictionary&quot; semantics. They own AAA now? REALLY that&#039;s just fucking great, now I&#039;m almost as pissed as when Rick Shwarts self-proclaimed himself the &quot;domain king&quot; really? REALLY? AHH</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree w/ these cases except for one AAA &#8211; Those domains they stole were generic! AAA is a generic term used for decades, it is ridiculous the UDRP panel awarded those domains to a auto insurance company. You know how scumbaggy those d-bags are? Seriously SCREW the UDRP panel, and the whole process of defining words in to &#8220;we own the dictionary&#8221; semantics. They own AAA now? REALLY that&#8217;s just fucking great, now I&#8217;m almost as pissed as when Rick Shwarts self-proclaimed himself the &#8220;domain king&#8221; really? REALLY? AHH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

