<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 Domain Dunce Award: Parava</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/31/2009-domain-dunce-award-parava/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/31/2009-domain-dunce-award-parava/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:34:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Prevent another Parava By Mining Domain Registry Reports - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/31/2009-domain-dunce-award-parava/comment-page-1/#comment-582088</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Prevent another Parava By Mining Domain Registry Reports - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9812#comment-582088</guid>
		<description>[...] was allegedly bilking its customers by accepting payments for multi-year renewals, and then only renewing the domain names a year at a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] was allegedly bilking its customers by accepting payments for multi-year renewals, and then only renewing the domain names a year at a [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stumble</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/31/2009-domain-dunce-award-parava/comment-page-1/#comment-537985</link>
		<dc:creator>stumble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 19:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9812#comment-537985</guid>
		<description>what legal action can be taken other than charge back ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what legal action can be taken other than charge back ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Tucows Takes Over Domains from 1stDomain.net - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/31/2009-domain-dunce-award-parava/comment-page-1/#comment-537199</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Tucows Takes Over Domains from 1stDomain.net - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 03:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9812#comment-537199</guid>
		<description>[...] Last year Tucows handled a bulk transfer from another de-accredited registrar, Parava. Hopefully this transfer will be easier for Tucows than the last one. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] Last year Tucows handled a bulk transfer from another de-accredited registrar, Parava. Hopefully this transfer will be easier for Tucows than the last one. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/31/2009-domain-dunce-award-parava/comment-page-1/#comment-535096</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 02:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9812#comment-535096</guid>
		<description>Louise - registrars can pay up to 10 years at a time to the registry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louise &#8211; registrars can pay up to 10 years at a time to the registry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louise</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/31/2009-domain-dunce-award-parava/comment-page-1/#comment-535091</link>
		<dc:creator>Louise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 02:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9812#comment-535091</guid>
		<description>Hi, Thanx that&#039;s interesting your previous articles linked to!  DomainNameWire is a crash course in domain industry!

My understanding from speaking with a Moniker rep is, domains are only leased for one year by Verisign, never longer.  Moniker only leases for five years, tops.  They accept the $$, and pay Verisign annually, only if you keep your setting on &quot;Auto Renew.&quot;  If you pay for five years, and turn off &quot;Auto Renew,&quot; it means you want to let the domain go at expiration!

There could be a reason you let the domain go.  It could be you found the domain violates someone&#039;s trademark and is a liability, so you let it go . . . The Moniker customer service rep - who was it? I have her name written down someplace - said switching the Auto Renew to &quot;off&quot; means you lost the advance payment you made about that domain.

It stands to reason if any Registrar loses its accreditation and domains are transferred in bulk, or even if domains are transferred in bulk on request, the advance payment is lost, because it&#039;s the Registrar who effects the renewal every year in your behalf, as long as you keep the Auto Renew setting to, &quot;on.&quot;  If you turn it to &quot;Off&quot; by mistake, you also lose the advance payment . . .

Therefore it&#039;s a false security to think your domain is safe because it is paid in advance for ten years.  This is entirely up to the Registrar, to keep the records straight and effect the renewal annually with Verisign!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Thanx that&#8217;s interesting your previous articles linked to!  DomainNameWire is a crash course in domain industry!</p>
<p>My understanding from speaking with a Moniker rep is, domains are only leased for one year by Verisign, never longer.  Moniker only leases for five years, tops.  They accept the $$, and pay Verisign annually, only if you keep your setting on &#8220;Auto Renew.&#8221;  If you pay for five years, and turn off &#8220;Auto Renew,&#8221; it means you want to let the domain go at expiration!</p>
<p>There could be a reason you let the domain go.  It could be you found the domain violates someone&#8217;s trademark and is a liability, so you let it go . . . The Moniker customer service rep &#8211; who was it? I have her name written down someplace &#8211; said switching the Auto Renew to &#8220;off&#8221; means you lost the advance payment you made about that domain.</p>
<p>It stands to reason if any Registrar loses its accreditation and domains are transferred in bulk, or even if domains are transferred in bulk on request, the advance payment is lost, because it&#8217;s the Registrar who effects the renewal every year in your behalf, as long as you keep the Auto Renew setting to, &#8220;on.&#8221;  If you turn it to &#8220;Off&#8221; by mistake, you also lose the advance payment . . .</p>
<p>Therefore it&#8217;s a false security to think your domain is safe because it is paid in advance for ten years.  This is entirely up to the Registrar, to keep the records straight and effect the renewal annually with Verisign!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domainer</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/31/2009-domain-dunce-award-parava/comment-page-1/#comment-534775</link>
		<dc:creator>Domainer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 05:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9812#comment-534775</guid>
		<description>I used Parava years ago until they gave  someone one of my domain names after they received a threatening email.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used Parava years ago until they gave  someone one of my domain names after they received a threatening email.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

