<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is eHelper.com a Typo of EdHelper.com?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/18/is-ehelper-com-a-typo-of-edhelper-com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/18/is-ehelper-com-a-typo-of-edhelper-com/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:34:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: edhelper &#124; World Top Trend</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/18/is-ehelper-com-a-typo-of-edhelper-com/comment-page-1/#comment-728222</link>
		<dc:creator>edhelper &#124; World Top Trend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 16:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9754#comment-728222</guid>
		<description>[...] When is a typo not a typo? Is eHelper.com a typo of EdHelper.com? Yes, according to National Arbitration Forum panelist Sandra J. Franklin. In a decision handed down yesterday, Franklin awarded the domain name ! eHelper. com to the owner More&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] When is a typo not a typo? Is eHelper.com a typo of EdHelper.com? Yes, according to National Arbitration Forum panelist Sandra J. Franklin. In a decision handed down yesterday, Franklin awarded the domain name ! eHelper. com to the owner More&#8230; [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FCliff</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/18/is-ehelper-com-a-typo-of-edhelper-com/comment-page-1/#comment-530995</link>
		<dc:creator>FCliff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 20:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9754#comment-530995</guid>
		<description>Shananagans!

Once again, UDRP FAILS.

This lowers the value of all domains! The fact that your domain can be stolen from you at any time with NO APPEAL PROCESS is a SHAM indeed.

What if eHelper owner was on vacation? What if his family inherited the domain and has no idea what to do in the case of reverse hi-jacking.

Sue Cliff and his client, fuck them both. Legal action is the country has become too common. It is EASIER to file UDRP than make an offer of 1-2k$ They would rather risk losing legal &quot;fees&quot; which really is just some hourly wages these fuckheads make up to make it seem like they do anything but COPY AND PASTE a case agaist you.

This industry is falling apart, not because of domainers, but because of LAWYER SCUM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shananagans!</p>
<p>Once again, UDRP FAILS.</p>
<p>This lowers the value of all domains! The fact that your domain can be stolen from you at any time with NO APPEAL PROCESS is a SHAM indeed.</p>
<p>What if eHelper owner was on vacation? What if his family inherited the domain and has no idea what to do in the case of reverse hi-jacking.</p>
<p>Sue Cliff and his client, fuck them both. Legal action is the country has become too common. It is EASIER to file UDRP than make an offer of 1-2k$ They would rather risk losing legal &#8220;fees&#8221; which really is just some hourly wages these fuckheads make up to make it seem like they do anything but COPY AND PASTE a case agaist you.</p>
<p>This industry is falling apart, not because of domainers, but because of LAWYER SCUM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/18/is-ehelper-com-a-typo-of-edhelper-com/comment-page-1/#comment-530455</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 07:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9754#comment-530455</guid>
		<description>This is why the UDRP as a mechanism is flawed and needs to be revamped in its entirety. And it will not come without a legal action. It&#039;s becoming a sham or shall I say, it&#039;s already a sham.

Evidently, there is no requirement for rationalization in business law to arrive at a decision in UDRP cases.

Henry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why the UDRP as a mechanism is flawed and needs to be revamped in its entirety. And it will not come without a legal action. It&#8217;s becoming a sham or shall I say, it&#8217;s already a sham.</p>
<p>Evidently, there is no requirement for rationalization in business law to arrive at a decision in UDRP cases.</p>
<p>Henry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stumble</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/18/is-ehelper-com-a-typo-of-edhelper-com/comment-page-1/#comment-530287</link>
		<dc:creator>stumble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 17:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9754#comment-530287</guid>
		<description>this is one of the worst udrp decision</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is one of the worst udrp decision</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mansour</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/18/is-ehelper-com-a-typo-of-edhelper-com/comment-page-1/#comment-530149</link>
		<dc:creator>Mansour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9754#comment-530149</guid>
		<description>Cliff
The only reason you went after ehelper.com that it is more valuable than edhelper.com it is crazy that you got the domain I am giving you a new list to go after. myhelper.com TeenHelper.com ($708.00)AsianHelper.com ($695.00)StarHelper.com ($500.00)RentHelper.com ($1,700.00)HostHelper.com ($500.00)CustomHelper.com ($1,243.00) and there is over 1100 more to go after that has the generic word helper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cliff<br />
The only reason you went after ehelper.com that it is more valuable than edhelper.com it is crazy that you got the domain I am giving you a new list to go after. myhelper.com TeenHelper.com ($708.00)AsianHelper.com ($695.00)StarHelper.com ($500.00)RentHelper.com ($1,700.00)HostHelper.com ($500.00)CustomHelper.com ($1,243.00) and there is over 1100 more to go after that has the generic word helper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Keating</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/18/is-ehelper-com-a-typo-of-edhelper-com/comment-page-1/#comment-530146</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Keating</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9754#comment-530146</guid>
		<description>&quot;Anyone who registers or acquires a domain name similar to an edHelper trademark in order to profit from diverting and confusing edHelper customers is a trademark infringer and will be pursued.&quot;

The issue is whether the mark is descriptive.  If the mark is for &quot;education assistance&quot; then use of the mark for that purpose would not be infringing.  The use would be consistent with the descriptive nature of the terms comprising the domain.

I personally feel that this asserted mark is descriptive and as long as the domain were used for descriptive purposes I would welcome any domain registrant that holds an &quot;e&quot; or &quot;ed&quot; helper domain to contact me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Anyone who registers or acquires a domain name similar to an edHelper trademark in order to profit from diverting and confusing edHelper customers is a trademark infringer and will be pursued.&#8221;</p>
<p>The issue is whether the mark is descriptive.  If the mark is for &#8220;education assistance&#8221; then use of the mark for that purpose would not be infringing.  The use would be consistent with the descriptive nature of the terms comprising the domain.</p>
<p>I personally feel that this asserted mark is descriptive and as long as the domain were used for descriptive purposes I would welcome any domain registrant that holds an &#8220;e&#8221; or &#8220;ed&#8221; helper domain to contact me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shahram</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/18/is-ehelper-com-a-typo-of-edhelper-com/comment-page-1/#comment-530050</link>
		<dc:creator>Shahram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 05:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9754#comment-530050</guid>
		<description>Well good for you. You screwed someone out of a good domain. Personaly I think eHelper.com is far superior of a domain and totally a stronger stand alone brand. Just like eHow.com or eBay.com. And just an FYI selling ads on a site is legit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well good for you. You screwed someone out of a good domain. Personaly I think eHelper.com is far superior of a domain and totally a stronger stand alone brand. Just like eHow.com or eBay.com. And just an FYI selling ads on a site is legit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

