<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Goodwill Non-Profit Sues to Get Goodwill.com Domain Name</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/17/goodwill-non-profit-sues-to-get-goodwill-com-domain-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/17/goodwill-non-profit-sues-to-get-goodwill-com-domain-name/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 11:38:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Goodwill.com Dispute Resolved Amicably - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/17/goodwill-non-profit-sues-to-get-goodwill-com-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-568497</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Goodwill.com Dispute Resolved Amicably - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9737#comment-568497</guid>
		<description>[...] December, Domain Name Wire wrote about non-profit Goodwill Industries filing a complaint over the domain name Goodwill.com. The domain name was won on NameJet for $55,000 just days before [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] December, Domain Name Wire wrote about non-profit Goodwill Industries filing a complaint over the domain name Goodwill.com. The domain name was won on NameJet for $55,000 just days before [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/17/goodwill-non-profit-sues-to-get-goodwill-com-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-550085</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9737#comment-550085</guid>
		<description>Yes, the case was dimissed a couple weeks ago:

http://domainnamewire.com/2010/01/14/goodwill-drops-lawsuit-over-goodwill-com-domain-name/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the case was dimissed a couple weeks ago:</p>
<p><a href="http://domainnamewire.com/2010/01/14/goodwill-drops-lawsuit-over-goodwill-com-domain-name/" rel="nofollow">http://domainnamewire.com/2010/01/14/goodwill-drops-lawsuit-over-goodwill-com-domain-name/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/17/goodwill-non-profit-sues-to-get-goodwill-com-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-550077</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9737#comment-550077</guid>
		<description>The domain now resolves to goodwill.org.  I think Josh was right.

Who is cyber2media?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The domain now resolves to goodwill.org.  I think Josh was right.</p>
<p>Who is cyber2media?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Goodwill Drops Lawsuit Over Goodwill.com Domain Name - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/17/goodwill-non-profit-sues-to-get-goodwill-com-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-540958</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Goodwill Drops Lawsuit Over Goodwill.com Domain Name - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9737#comment-540958</guid>
		<description>[...] has voluntarily dismissed its case against Cyber2Media over the domain name [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] has voluntarily dismissed its case against Cyber2Media over the domain name [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/17/goodwill-non-profit-sues-to-get-goodwill-com-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-530742</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9737#comment-530742</guid>
		<description>Also Lee, I am not ignoring the potential fact the name was used to infringe on their mark and no further monetary damage should be awarded. I know for a fact that in most all cases a simple transfer of ownership is sufficient. Therefore if I were GI I would try to settle for less than the full $55k stating the defendant is fortunate to receive anything considering the circumstances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also Lee, I am not ignoring the potential fact the name was used to infringe on their mark and no further monetary damage should be awarded. I know for a fact that in most all cases a simple transfer of ownership is sufficient. Therefore if I were GI I would try to settle for less than the full $55k stating the defendant is fortunate to receive anything considering the circumstances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/17/goodwill-non-profit-sues-to-get-goodwill-com-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-530740</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9737#comment-530740</guid>
		<description>It would only be a fair resolution imo if it did not exceed the price they would pay(should the complaints be factual) to persue it via the courts or complaint process. 

Now it isn&#039;t as easy as this as the complaint machine and lawyers are in motion likely before such an offer would ever be an option and therefore costs would already have been incurred. Also I understand that sensable decisions are not the ones most commonly made and I suspect they would persue even if the cost exceeded a settlement, this is not a suprise. However is it possible they are not paying a dime for legal counsel and perhaps it was donated?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would only be a fair resolution imo if it did not exceed the price they would pay(should the complaints be factual) to persue it via the courts or complaint process. </p>
<p>Now it isn&#8217;t as easy as this as the complaint machine and lawyers are in motion likely before such an offer would ever be an option and therefore costs would already have been incurred. Also I understand that sensable decisions are not the ones most commonly made and I suspect they would persue even if the cost exceeded a settlement, this is not a suprise. However is it possible they are not paying a dime for legal counsel and perhaps it was donated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee H.</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/17/goodwill-non-profit-sues-to-get-goodwill-com-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-530717</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9737#comment-530717</guid>
		<description>@josh 

Here&#039;s a wrench in your argument. If the owner was willing to give the name to Goodwill Inc. for the $55k he plunked down, not making any profit, would that be a fair resolution?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@josh </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a wrench in your argument. If the owner was willing to give the name to Goodwill Inc. for the $55k he plunked down, not making any profit, would that be a fair resolution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

