<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comments 15-0 Against Expedited UDRP.  So What Will ICANN Do?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/15/comments-15-0-against-expedited-udrp-so-what-will-icann-do/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/15/comments-15-0-against-expedited-udrp-so-what-will-icann-do/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:15:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Coming March 15: File a UDRP for 500 EUR - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/15/comments-15-0-against-expedited-udrp-so-what-will-icann-do/comment-page-1/#comment-570383</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Coming March 15: File a UDRP for 500 EUR - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9711#comment-570383</guid>
		<description>[...] (CAC) had proposed a sort of &#8220;dual track&#8221; UDRP, which was unanimously opposed by the ICANN community. CAC disagreed with the community feedback and adjusted the messaging for the reduced-fee service, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] (CAC) had proposed a sort of &#8220;dual track&#8221; UDRP, which was unanimously opposed by the ICANN community. CAC disagreed with the community feedback and adjusted the messaging for the reduced-fee service, [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/15/comments-15-0-against-expedited-udrp-so-what-will-icann-do/comment-page-1/#comment-527634</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9711#comment-527634</guid>
		<description>@ Antony - technically the comment period has ended, although ICANN hasn&#039;t been able to figure out how to shut off its commenting system upon the deadline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Antony &#8211; technically the comment period has ended, although ICANN hasn&#8217;t been able to figure out how to shut off its commenting system upon the deadline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antony Van Couvering</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/15/comments-15-0-against-expedited-udrp-so-what-will-icann-do/comment-page-1/#comment-527592</link>
		<dc:creator>Antony Van Couvering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9711#comment-527592</guid>
		<description>Hi Andrew, I&#039;m sure that with your article there will now be some of Verizon&#039;s over 100 paid lobbyists writing in to ICANN...

It might be 50-15 before the weekend...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andrew, I&#8217;m sure that with your article there will now be some of Verizon&#8217;s over 100 paid lobbyists writing in to ICANN&#8230;</p>
<p>It might be 50-15 before the weekend&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belmassio</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/15/comments-15-0-against-expedited-udrp-so-what-will-icann-do/comment-page-1/#comment-527472</link>
		<dc:creator>Belmassio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9711#comment-527472</guid>
		<description>They&#039;ll &quot;take into consideration&quot; the replies, then commission an &quot;independent analysis report&quot; from some bunk macroeconomist that has never run a business in his life, and conclude that moving forward is &quot;more prudent&quot; than allowing the status quo to remain in effect as &quot;trademark interest must trump the insidious underminings of our trademark system as we have known it for over 100 years. &quot;  Amen!

Spin, spin, spin, spin, spin, spin, and spin some damn more until they get what they want

ICANN is total rubbish.  They have never shown respect for domain owner rights whatsoever....period.

Has Rod Beckstrom done one thing since he has gotten in office to strengthen domain owner rights?  I only see him flouting the trademark interests so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;ll &#8220;take into consideration&#8221; the replies, then commission an &#8220;independent analysis report&#8221; from some bunk macroeconomist that has never run a business in his life, and conclude that moving forward is &#8220;more prudent&#8221; than allowing the status quo to remain in effect as &#8220;trademark interest must trump the insidious underminings of our trademark system as we have known it for over 100 years. &#8221;  Amen!</p>
<p>Spin, spin, spin, spin, spin, spin, and spin some damn more until they get what they want</p>
<p>ICANN is total rubbish.  They have never shown respect for domain owner rights whatsoever&#8230;.period.</p>
<p>Has Rod Beckstrom done one thing since he has gotten in office to strengthen domain owner rights?  I only see him flouting the trademark interests so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Latest Domainer News</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/15/comments-15-0-against-expedited-udrp-so-what-will-icann-do/comment-page-1/#comment-528468</link>
		<dc:creator>Latest Domainer News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9711#comment-528468</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Comments 15-0 Against Expedited UDRP.  So What Will ICANN Do? - http://tinyurl.com/y8usxey&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Comments 15-0 Against Expedited UDRP.  So What Will ICANN Do? &#8211; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/y8usxey" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/y8usxey</a></span></span></span></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

