You sputtered: “Oh and by the way, reaching me on twitter is just the best way to dm me your email address, could care less to speak to you in my steam Stephen, you aren’t nearly worth my time there.”

Then you went and tried to get me to connect to you as an associate on Linkedin. Nice try. Buy a copy of “Strunk & White” and write me back after you’ve read it – three times.

However, I must commend you for using your real name, so you have my respect at that level. I think a lot of domainers would like to continue reading your opinions. I was wrong in stating that your comments are a waste of time. I apologize for that statement.

Don’t stop stating your perceptions and opinions about domaining because of the “heat” you receive. Learn from responses to your comments by domainers who have spent years promoting and building the domain industry. Realize we’re still little teeny babies in that respect, because this industry, as a collective whole, is really only about 7 years old, or less.

cheers

Cheers

[...] I read the post about the reporter from the New Times, Craig Agranoff who reported on the South Domainers meeting, [...]

Hey Craig, use some other industry that doesn’t have SUCKERS to lure them into your lame TWITTER account. What will TWITTER do for you than having a logical discussion on the various domain blogs that featured your biased, incomplete, and subjective comments based on ONE event you attended, and didn’t even push the room for comments.

I’m pretty sure that most domainers aren’t going to pump up your lame Twitter account in order to give you answers to questions you SHOULD have obtained while you were present at an event that provided you with a mind congregation of successful domainers.

Dammit, are we still talking about this loser? Why is that? IS it because we’ve identified this guy as the worst news reporter who not only has his fingers dipped into the honey of domain development and monetization, but who has also lured us all into having a conversation with a nobody.

I don’t care if he’s a reporter. If I was his editor, I’d call him into my office and say “what was this piece of crap you wrote?”

If his paper wants a real report, with the good and bad of domain investing, then get a real reporter who RESEARCHES the facts and talks to people, and includes QUOTES and other comments verified by their websites or other domainers who agree or disagree.

It just looks like another guy wanting to build up his Twitter account… something I warned against a month ago.

“Hi, I have a Twitter account. Give me your detailed explanations of your domain investing experience and send it to my Twitter account, which won’t allow you to make a significant response, unless you make a series of posts, connected. Which makes me look good. ”

BTW — My sarcastic remark above would be too long for a Twitter post. That shows you how important Twitter is to real professionals.