Comments on: Hostess Gets Pie on its Face in Domain Dispute

By: Andrew Allemann

Andrew Allemann — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:43:42 +0000

@ Domain Investor – its just one of Domain Capital’s customers.

By: Domain Investor

Domain Investor — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:50:44 +0000

Since, the dns is not resolving, when I type hostess.com into my url bar it displays google searches for – hostess.

If anything, Google is the one infringing on hostess cakes since they are selling advertising. But, that is a different argument.

Does Domain Capital own the domain or holding a lien on the domain by controlling the whois?

By: Domainer

Domainer — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 13:07:01 +0000

Ironically their non-use of Hostess.com results in ads for Hostess Twinkies for me since I’m using Verizon for my DSL.

By: pitbullstew

pitbullstew — Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:47:08 +0000

yeah sure… ya’ll keep getting cute with well established corporate identities like this one you will soon learn the wrath of the lobbying industry as they turn their sites on yours, if any one thinks that they are going to disrupt business in this manner?
yer nuts.

By: BidNo

BidNo — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:22:42 +0000

Hallelujah! A fair and even-handed decision from a UDRP panelist.

If only the UDRP process were defined so it didn’t burden hapless domain owners with $10,000 of legal expenses.

By: M. Menius

M. Menius — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:40:45 +0000

A1 logical result. If only a reverse hijacking finding would have been announced. And I say that because Hostess’ UDRP representative should have known that no infringement had actually occurred, and thus no real cause on which to proceed.

So they decided to roll the dice with someone else’s property. Greedy.

By: Latest Domainer News

Latest Domainer News — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 22:13:03 +0000

Hostess Gets Pie on its Face in Domain Dispute – http://tinyurl.com/ybxsfcv