<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Name Administration Challenges &#8220;Cheat Code&#8221; Trademark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/02/name-administration-challenges-cheat-code-trademark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/02/name-administration-challenges-cheat-code-trademark/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 11:38:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TLD News - News from world of domains</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/02/name-administration-challenges-cheat-code-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-640847</link>
		<dc:creator>TLD News - News from world of domains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 20:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9533#comment-640847</guid>
		<description>[...] AdministrationÂ filed for cancellation of the Cheat Code mark in November. On June 10 Name Administrationâ€™s lawyers informed the USPTO [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] AdministrationÂ filed for cancellation of the Cheat Code mark in November. On June 10 Name Administrationâ€™s lawyers informed the USPTO [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Name Administration Reaches Settlement over Cheat Code Mark - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/02/name-administration-challenges-cheat-code-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-640837</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Name Administration Reaches Settlement over Cheat Code Mark - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9533#comment-640837</guid>
		<description>[...] Administration filed for cancellation of the Cheat Code mark in November. On June 10 Name Administration&#8217;s lawyers informed the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] Administration filed for cancellation of the Cheat Code mark in November. On June 10 Name Administration&#8217;s lawyers informed the [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cheat codes</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/02/name-administration-challenges-cheat-code-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-521413</link>
		<dc:creator>cheat codes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9533#comment-521413</guid>
		<description>these companies think they can do whatever they wish</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>these companies think they can do whatever they wish</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: france</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/02/name-administration-challenges-cheat-code-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-521342</link>
		<dc:creator>france</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 13:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9533#comment-521342</guid>
		<description>ha ha this is hilarious. they deserve to cancel the tm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ha ha this is hilarious. they deserve to cancel the tm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uk dental recruitment</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/02/name-administration-challenges-cheat-code-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-521313</link>
		<dc:creator>uk dental recruitment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9533#comment-521313</guid>
		<description>so how long do people have to petition for cancellation of a trademark?
i&#039;m all for protecting generic domains and also all for tm holders. theres fairness on both sides. hope frank wins.
if you&#039;re a tm holder though, how long do people have to challenge your trademark via cancellation process once you get granted a tm?
anyone know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so how long do people have to petition for cancellation of a trademark?<br />
i&#8217;m all for protecting generic domains and also all for tm holders. theres fairness on both sides. hope frank wins.<br />
if you&#8217;re a tm holder though, how long do people have to challenge your trademark via cancellation process once you get granted a tm?<br />
anyone know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/02/name-administration-challenges-cheat-code-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-521236</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 06:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9533#comment-521236</guid>
		<description>Funny you really believe &quot;Cheaper than buying from Frank!&quot;

What do you think will happen if, depending on how many businesses, domainers and/or domain owners alike they have threatened, the threatened entities decide to take similar action to challenge the trademark individually, severally, or collectively?

The action or actions may not necessarily be to win but to create fracas within their business arrangements. That for sure can be very costly especially if they end up losing the very trademark protection for which the risk was taken in the first place. Even if it&#039;s a mere dilution of the mark, there is an inherent cost associated with that given the potential business disruptions.

The point is, it depends on how each threatened entity decides to fight. One of these days they will pick on a prickly entity that&#039;s just looking for the opportunity to create mayhem for bullies like that. Win or lose, they may not like the outcome.

Just a thought or two!

Henry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny you really believe &#8220;Cheaper than buying from Frank!&#8221;</p>
<p>What do you think will happen if, depending on how many businesses, domainers and/or domain owners alike they have threatened, the threatened entities decide to take similar action to challenge the trademark individually, severally, or collectively?</p>
<p>The action or actions may not necessarily be to win but to create fracas within their business arrangements. That for sure can be very costly especially if they end up losing the very trademark protection for which the risk was taken in the first place. Even if it&#8217;s a mere dilution of the mark, there is an inherent cost associated with that given the potential business disruptions.</p>
<p>The point is, it depends on how each threatened entity decides to fight. One of these days they will pick on a prickly entity that&#8217;s just looking for the opportunity to create mayhem for bullies like that. Win or lose, they may not like the outcome.</p>
<p>Just a thought or two!</p>
<p>Henry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Berryhill</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/12/02/name-administration-challenges-cheat-code-trademark/comment-page-1/#comment-521101</link>
		<dc:creator>John Berryhill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9533#comment-521101</guid>
		<description>&quot;â€œYou gotta love frank.â€

No you donâ€™t.&quot;

I&#039;m sorry, Kevin, but you do.

It&#039;s in the DomainNameWire Terms of Service.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;â€œYou gotta love frank.â€</p>
<p>No you donâ€™t.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry, Kevin, but you do.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s in the DomainNameWire Terms of Service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

