<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Green Day Wants AmericanIdiot.com Domain Name</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/11/24/green-day-wants-americanidiot-com-domain-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/11/24/green-day-wants-americanidiot-com-domain-name/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 11:38:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Netglomerateâ„¢ &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rock Band Queen Lays Claim to WeWillRockYou.com Domain Name</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/11/24/green-day-wants-americanidiot-com-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-992955</link>
		<dc:creator>Netglomerateâ„¢ &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rock Band Queen Lays Claim to WeWillRockYou.com Domain Name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9382#comment-992955</guid>
		<description>[...] Green Day Wants AmericanIdiot.com Domain Name [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] Green Day Wants AmericanIdiot.com Domain Name [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanya</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/11/24/green-day-wants-americanidiot-com-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-542438</link>
		<dc:creator>Tanya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 03:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9382#comment-542438</guid>
		<description>They went with http://www.americanidiotonbroadway.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They went with <a href="http://www.americanidiotonbroadway.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.americanidiotonbroadway.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Green Day Fan Site &#187; Green Day Fight&#8217;s For It&#8217;s Right To The Interweb</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/11/24/green-day-wants-americanidiot-com-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-523888</link>
		<dc:creator>A Green Day Fan Site &#187; Green Day Fight&#8217;s For It&#8217;s Right To The Interweb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 12:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9382#comment-523888</guid>
		<description>[...] Day filed for arbitration over ownership of the AmericanIdiot.com domain name. According to comments, it last changed hands for $850. The fight seems to pit webheads [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] Day filed for arbitration over ownership of the AmericanIdiot.com domain name. According to comments, it last changed hands for $850. The fight seems to pit webheads [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/11/24/green-day-wants-americanidiot-com-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-520808</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 14:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9382#comment-520808</guid>
		<description>@ Chris - you don&#039;t have to have a filed trademark to have a trademark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Chris &#8211; you don&#8217;t have to have a filed trademark to have a trademark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Nielsen</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/11/24/green-day-wants-americanidiot-com-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-520549</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Nielsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 04:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9382#comment-520549</guid>
		<description>Some people have pretty strong opinions about stories like this, but that does not make what they say the truth or the law.

A squatter is defined as someone using property and breaking the law. A domain is like a plot of land. If you pay for it, you have the legal right to it unless there is some ownership issue (like a trademark) that is more important. Is the song or album name trademarked? If it is that&#039;s the end of the story. I doubt it is since it&#039;s probabaly covered under &quot;copyright&quot; and who trademarks their song titles or album names? Maybe they should and maybe they did. But if not then there&#039;s not much to talk about. 

Do you know what the cost would be to trademark all of the song titles in the Beatles collection???

Sorry, but in this case, Greenday should have just bought the domain if they wanted it so bad, or they could get americanidiot.biz or americanidiot.us if they hurry. Someone was smart enough to reg AMERICANIDIOTTICKETS.COM, but I doubt it was Green Day.

Isn&#039;t it about time that people start hiring domain name consultants to help them avoid this kind of problem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people have pretty strong opinions about stories like this, but that does not make what they say the truth or the law.</p>
<p>A squatter is defined as someone using property and breaking the law. A domain is like a plot of land. If you pay for it, you have the legal right to it unless there is some ownership issue (like a trademark) that is more important. Is the song or album name trademarked? If it is that&#8217;s the end of the story. I doubt it is since it&#8217;s probabaly covered under &#8220;copyright&#8221; and who trademarks their song titles or album names? Maybe they should and maybe they did. But if not then there&#8217;s not much to talk about. </p>
<p>Do you know what the cost would be to trademark all of the song titles in the Beatles collection???</p>
<p>Sorry, but in this case, Greenday should have just bought the domain if they wanted it so bad, or they could get americanidiot.biz or americanidiot.us if they hurry. Someone was smart enough to reg AMERICANIDIOTTICKETS.COM, but I doubt it was Green Day.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it about time that people start hiring domain name consultants to help them avoid this kind of problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GreenDayFriend</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/11/24/green-day-wants-americanidiot-com-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-520167</link>
		<dc:creator>GreenDayFriend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 12:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9382#comment-520167</guid>
		<description>The band had 5 years to think about it and now wants it. I say no.

I&#039;m on the domain owner side as he should have a very nice $$$$$ Green day.

Domain name owner should get 5% of the record sales of americanidiot for the domain name. Such an appropriate name in this situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The band had 5 years to think about it and now wants it. I say no.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m on the domain owner side as he should have a very nice $$$$$ Green day.</p>
<p>Domain name owner should get 5% of the record sales of americanidiot for the domain name. Such an appropriate name in this situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Douglas</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/11/24/green-day-wants-americanidiot-com-domain-name/comment-page-1/#comment-516090</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9382#comment-516090</guid>
		<description>Go Green Day!

Go Domainers!

Umm... who is right? The band that made the phrase popular and sold prodservs with it, or the domainer that grabbed it and is using it for... umm... pointing out GW Bush and his Administration? (if he was, I&#039;d be on his side).

Green Day will get the domain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Green Day!</p>
<p>Go Domainers!</p>
<p>Umm&#8230; who is right? The band that made the phrase popular and sold prodservs with it, or the domainer that grabbed it and is using it for&#8230; umm&#8230; pointing out GW Bush and his Administration? (if he was, I&#8217;d be on his side).</p>
<p>Green Day will get the domain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

