Comments on: Coming Soon: File a UDRP Domain Name Dispute for $250

By: Domain Name Wire » News » ICA Requests Action on Czech Arbitration Court Policy Changes - The Domain Industry's News Source

Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:49:37 +0000

[...] Arbitration Court (CAC), one of the newest UDRP providers, proposed a new scheme in which it would charge only 500 EUR to file a domain name complaint and arbitrators would not [...]

By: Domain Name Wire » News » Coming March 15: File a UDRP for 500 EUR - The Domain Industry's News Source

Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:58:21 +0000

[...] Arbitration Court (CAC) had proposed a sort of “dual track” UDRP, which was unanimously opposed by the ICANN community. CAC disagreed with the community feedback [...]

By: Domain Name Wire » News » Good Luck Finding the UDRP Arbitration Provider Contract with ICANN - The Domain Industry's News Source

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:08:17 +0000

[...] two UDRP arbitration providers trying to change up the rules, attorney Jim Davies tried to get his hands on the contract between ICANN and its approved UDRP [...]

By: George Kirikos

George Kirikos — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:13:39 +0000

Just a reminder to folks that tomorrow (Friday December 11th) is the final day to submit comments on the CAC proposal.

By: Zbynek Loebl

Zbynek Loebl — Sun, 15 Nov 2009 08:54:38 +0000

Hi,

our proposal is not a dual-track UDRP. It is quite simple: in principle, the CAC will have a lower filing fee if the complaint will be short and no response will be filed. The same level of assessment will be applied by the same UDRP panellists. The decision will contain principal arguments.The same time limits and everything will apply. Panellists will have a discretion to require normal filing fee where fair and reasonable.

The CAC did not follow WIPO in its proposal. We presented our first draft in the end of July. We are obviously pleased that WIPO presented substantially similar concept in Seoul at the ICANN meeting. Similarly as with the electronic UDRP, we try to develop modern UDRP services which would respond to the current needs of Internet environment.

By: stu

stu — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 20:18:08 +0000

Ahh,i love it,i will be very rich soon,filing all them cases for aged old domains with dud email addresses……….I LOVE IT !

By: Philip Corwin

Philip Corwin — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:58:29 +0000

The ICA is extremely concerned about the implications of the CAC announcement and the pending rollout of a similar proposal from WIPO. We have just posted extensive comments on these developments at http://www.internetcommerce.org/Registrant_UDRP_Rights .

I am pleased to see Mr. Loebl’s statement that the proposed expedited procedure will only be implemented if it receives approval from ICANN. We believe that a dual-track UDRP is a significant policy change that requires GNSO review and ICANN Board approval prior to implementation, and we shall have more to say on that matter shortly.