<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MediaWhiz Nailed for Reverse Domain Name Hijacking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/11/10/mediawhiz-nailed-for-reverse-domain-name-hijacking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/11/10/mediawhiz-nailed-for-reverse-domain-name-hijacking/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 04:47:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fresh Avails</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/11/10/mediawhiz-nailed-for-reverse-domain-name-hijacking/comment-page-1/#comment-507718</link>
		<dc:creator>Fresh Avails</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9112#comment-507718</guid>
		<description>The owner is an active domainer/moderator on Nampros and DNF so I am sure he was well informed.  Good to see one of the good guys win one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The owner is an active domainer/moderator on Nampros and DNF so I am sure he was well informed.  Good to see one of the good guys win one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Berryhill</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/11/10/mediawhiz-nailed-for-reverse-domain-name-hijacking/comment-page-1/#comment-507684</link>
		<dc:creator>John Berryhill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9112#comment-507684</guid>
		<description>Good question at the end, Andrew.  The New York company decided to go after an Indian company because they thought they could simply roll someone who was not well informed about the process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question at the end, Andrew.  The New York company decided to go after an Indian company because they thought they could simply roll someone who was not well informed about the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Latest Domainer News</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/11/10/mediawhiz-nailed-for-reverse-domain-name-hijacking/comment-page-1/#comment-528688</link>
		<dc:creator>Latest Domainer News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=9112#comment-528688</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;MediaWhiz Nailed for Reverse Domain Name Hijacking - http://tinyurl.com/yjsoz9h&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">MediaWhiz Nailed for Reverse Domain Name Hijacking &#8211; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yjsoz9h" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yjsoz9h</a></span></span></span></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
