Comments on: Noss Calls Out WIPO at ICANN Meeting http://domainnamewire.com/2009/10/26/noss-calls-out-wipo-at-icann-meeting/ News and Views for the Domain Name Industry Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:39:30 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: DomainNameNews http://domainnamewire.com/2009/10/26/noss-calls-out-wipo-at-icann-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-530054 DomainNameNews Mon, 26 Oct 2009 17:25:02 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8869#comment-530054 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">#domains Noss Calls Out WIPO at ICANN Meeting - Domain Name Wire http://ow.ly/wDRl</span></span>

#domains Noss Calls Out WIPO at ICANN Meeting – Domain Name Wire http://ow.ly/wDRl

]]> By: Oklahoma http://domainnamewire.com/2009/10/26/noss-calls-out-wipo-at-icann-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-499875 Oklahoma Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:51:35 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8869#comment-499875 There are probably shell companies owned by collection agencies controlling WIPO, just like it has been shown to be the case with the NAF. This will all come tumbling down eventually since they are all crooks. There are probably shell companies owned by collection agencies controlling WIPO, just like it has been shown to be the case with the NAF.

This will all come tumbling down eventually since they are all crooks.

]]> By: Antony Van Couvering http://domainnamewire.com/2009/10/26/noss-calls-out-wipo-at-icann-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-499874 Antony Van Couvering Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:49:18 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8869#comment-499874 WIPO also plays fast and loose with their statistics, asserting for instance that "cybersquatting" is on the increase, when in fact the increase a WIPO actually represents a migration by forum shoppers away from providers who side with domain holders more often than WIPO does. Actually there has been a net decrease, even as domain volume has increased. I have found them to be less and less credible. WIPO also plays fast and loose with their statistics, asserting for instance that “cybersquatting” is on the increase, when in fact the increase a WIPO actually represents a migration by forum shoppers away from providers who side with domain holders more often than WIPO does. Actually there has been a net decrease, even as domain volume has increased. I have found them to be less and less credible.

]]> By: Latest Domainer News http://domainnamewire.com/2009/10/26/noss-calls-out-wipo-at-icann-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-530055 Latest Domainer News Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:13:03 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8869#comment-530055 <span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Noss Calls Out WIPO at ICANN Meeting - http://tinyurl.com/yg23sms</span></span>

Noss Calls Out WIPO at ICANN Meeting – http://tinyurl.com/yg23sms

]]> By: Howard http://domainnamewire.com/2009/10/26/noss-calls-out-wipo-at-icann-meeting/comment-page-1/#comment-499848 Howard Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:54:42 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8869#comment-499848 WIPO also has a consistency problem on their appointment of a third panelist who is supposed to be impartial. Often a review of their decisions indicate that they have never denied a complaint, but the Respondent has no choice when 5 of these so-called impartial panelists are the choices from which they have to pick. WIPO also has a consistency problem on their appointment of a third panelist who is supposed to be impartial. Often a review of their decisions indicate that they have never denied a complaint, but the Respondent has no choice when 5 of these so-called impartial panelists are the choices from which they have to pick.

]]>