<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Verizon Files Another Cybersquatting Lawsuit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/10/19/verizon-files-another-cybersquatting-lawsuit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/10/19/verizon-files-another-cybersquatting-lawsuit/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:49:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Verizon Settles Trademark Domain Name Case - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/10/19/verizon-files-another-cybersquatting-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-553626</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Verizon Settles Trademark Domain Name Case - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8745#comment-553626</guid>
		<description>[...] communications company filed the complaint in October, alleging that the defendants parked typos of its popular Verizon trademark in order to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] communications company filed the complaint in October, alleging that the defendants parked typos of its popular Verizon trademark in order to [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cartoonz</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/10/19/verizon-files-another-cybersquatting-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-496404</link>
		<dc:creator>Cartoonz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 23:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8745#comment-496404</guid>
		<description>err... &quot;Verizon&quot;... lol, I guess it is an easy misspell</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>err&#8230; &#8220;Verizon&#8221;&#8230; lol, I guess it is an easy misspell</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cartoonz</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/10/19/verizon-files-another-cybersquatting-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-496401</link>
		<dc:creator>Cartoonz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 23:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8745#comment-496401</guid>
		<description>&quot;Among the potentially infringing domain names listed in the case are varizon.com, vierzon.com, and virazon.com.&quot;

Interesting... VErison themselves own 2 of those 3 and the other one?  Registered this June to some completely unrelated party.

WTF?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Among the potentially infringing domain names listed in the case are varizon.com, vierzon.com, and virazon.com.&#8221;</p>
<p>Interesting&#8230; VErison themselves own 2 of those 3 and the other one?  Registered this June to some completely unrelated party.</p>
<p>WTF?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik J. Heels</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/10/19/verizon-files-another-cybersquatting-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-528514</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik J. Heels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8745#comment-528514</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Verizon Files Another Cybersquatting Lawsuit http://ff.im/-a8wtj&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Verizon Files Another Cybersquatting Lawsuit <a href="http://ff.im/-a8wtj" rel="nofollow">http://ff.im/-a8wtj</a></span></span></span></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/10/19/verizon-files-another-cybersquatting-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-496254</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8745#comment-496254</guid>
		<description>lackey - that was navigation catalyst, I believe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lackey &#8211; that was navigation catalyst, I believe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Latest Domainer News</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/10/19/verizon-files-another-cybersquatting-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-528515</link>
		<dc:creator>Latest Domainer News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8745#comment-528515</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Verizon Files Another Cybersquatting Lawsuit - http://tinyurl.com/yf32dtp&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Verizon Files Another Cybersquatting Lawsuit &#8211; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yf32dtp" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yf32dtp</a></span></span></span></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lackey</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/10/19/verizon-files-another-cybersquatting-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-496253</link>
		<dc:creator>lackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8745#comment-496253</guid>
		<description>Warren&#039;s defense is simple. He should counter sue on the grounds that Verizon is placing ads on misspellings of his domains. I forget the case but a company who was sued by verizon did just this and verizon was forced to settle out of court for no money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Warren&#8217;s defense is simple. He should counter sue on the grounds that Verizon is placing ads on misspellings of his domains. I forget the case but a company who was sued by verizon did just this and verizon was forced to settle out of court for no money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

