<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Economist: ICANN Will Be Set Free This Month</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/09/24/economist-icann-will-be-set-free-this-month/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/09/24/economist-icann-will-be-set-free-this-month/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 20:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Is Paris a Model for New Internet Governance? Let&#8217;s Hope Not. - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/09/24/economist-icann-will-be-set-free-this-month/comment-page-1/#comment-486557</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Is Paris a Model for New Internet Governance? Let&#8217;s Hope Not. - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 02:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8349#comment-486557</guid>
		<description>[...] the U.S. cedes more control of ICANN to foreign governments, many people are worried about what happens when censoring countries like [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] the U.S. cedes more control of ICANN to foreign governments, many people are worried about what happens when censoring countries like [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Beach</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/09/24/economist-icann-will-be-set-free-this-month/comment-page-1/#comment-486483</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Beach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8349#comment-486483</guid>
		<description>..and the silence was deafening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..and the silence was deafening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; ICANN To Announce New Governance Structure on Wednesday - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/09/24/economist-icann-will-be-set-free-this-month/comment-page-1/#comment-486390</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; ICANN To Announce New Governance Structure on Wednesday - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8349#comment-486390</guid>
		<description>[...] details are not available at this time, sources tell Domain Name Wire that The Economist&#8217;s article regarding an &#8220;Affirmation of Commitments&#8221; is a fair representation of the new [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] details are not available at this time, sources tell Domain Name Wire that The Economist&#8217;s article regarding an &#8220;Affirmation of Commitments&#8221; is a fair representation of the new [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Reporters Without Borders: Keep the ICANN Status Quo - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/09/24/economist-icann-will-be-set-free-this-month/comment-page-1/#comment-486286</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Reporters Without Borders: Keep the ICANN Status Quo - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8349#comment-486286</guid>
		<description>[...] Borders, based in France, may be in for disappointment. The Economist has reported that ICANN is close to a deal with the U.S. government to enter a new phase of governance with more foreign government [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] Borders, based in France, may be in for disappointment. The Economist has reported that ICANN is close to a deal with the U.S. government to enter a new phase of governance with more foreign government [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Beach</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/09/24/economist-icann-will-be-set-free-this-month/comment-page-1/#comment-485202</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Beach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 00:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8349#comment-485202</guid>
		<description>@Steve - think of it this way - Let&#039;s say I own a business selling labelmakers at Labelmakers.com, making $50,000 profit per year.  A leading manufacturer, let&#039;s say Brother, approaches me and offers $100,000 for my domain.  I refuse, of course, as it&#039;s worth more than two year&#039;s revenue.  

Brother then approach Verisign (a for-profit company) and offers them $100,000 for Labelmakers.com.  That&#039;s money for nothing for Verisign.  When my renewal comes around I find the price per year is $100,000.  I can&#039;t pay and lose the domain.  Verisign gets a &quot;free&quot; $100,000.

And that&#039;s assuming they don&#039;t simply auction it off to the highest bidder.  And who&#039;s going to stop them?  ICANN?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Steve &#8211; think of it this way &#8211; Let&#8217;s say I own a business selling labelmakers at Labelmakers.com, making $50,000 profit per year.  A leading manufacturer, let&#8217;s say Brother, approaches me and offers $100,000 for my domain.  I refuse, of course, as it&#8217;s worth more than two year&#8217;s revenue.  </p>
<p>Brother then approach Verisign (a for-profit company) and offers them $100,000 for Labelmakers.com.  That&#8217;s money for nothing for Verisign.  When my renewal comes around I find the price per year is $100,000.  I can&#8217;t pay and lose the domain.  Verisign gets a &#8220;free&#8221; $100,000.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s assuming they don&#8217;t simply auction it off to the highest bidder.  And who&#8217;s going to stop them?  ICANN?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Beach</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/09/24/economist-icann-will-be-set-free-this-month/comment-page-1/#comment-485199</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Beach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 00:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8349#comment-485199</guid>
		<description>@Steve - as Andrew pointed out above, this already happens in ccTLD extensions like .TV, and is the pricing model that some of the new GTLDs are proposing.  So no, I&#039;m not high.  If the new GTLDs get approved, the existing GTLDs, through the level playing-field clauses in the registy agreements, will be able to ask for the removal of price caps and ICANN won&#039;t be able (or willing?) to deny them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Steve &#8211; as Andrew pointed out above, this already happens in ccTLD extensions like .TV, and is the pricing model that some of the new GTLDs are proposing.  So no, I&#8217;m not high.  If the new GTLDs get approved, the existing GTLDs, through the level playing-field clauses in the registy agreements, will be able to ask for the removal of price caps and ICANN won&#8217;t be able (or willing?) to deny them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/09/24/economist-icann-will-be-set-free-this-month/comment-page-1/#comment-485104</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 16:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8349#comment-485104</guid>
		<description>@ Steve - that&#039;s exactly what goes on in some of the ccTLDs, and effectively in newer TLDs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Steve &#8211; that&#8217;s exactly what goes on in some of the ccTLDs, and effectively in newer TLDs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

