<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tenant Dispute Over HomeAwayfromHome.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/09/18/tenant-dispute-over-homeawayfromhome-com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/09/18/tenant-dispute-over-homeawayfromhome-com/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 03:17:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/09/18/tenant-dispute-over-homeawayfromhome-com/comment-page-1/#comment-482531</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 15:09:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8243#comment-482531</guid>
		<description>Henry - yes, I&#039;ve seen a handful of lawsuits filed after UDRPs, and part of that is the original respondent challenging the trademark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Henry &#8211; yes, I&#8217;ve seen a handful of lawsuits filed after UDRPs, and part of that is the original respondent challenging the trademark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/09/18/tenant-dispute-over-homeawayfromhome-com/comment-page-1/#comment-482527</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8243#comment-482527</guid>
		<description>Just a thought. Is it legally possible to challenge the trademark after the fact since it&#039;s the basis for filing the domain arbitration? 

Maybe the fear of losing their mark on a generic term entirely may be enough to give them pause. They will think twice before initiating one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a thought. Is it legally possible to challenge the trademark after the fact since it&#8217;s the basis for filing the domain arbitration? </p>
<p>Maybe the fear of losing their mark on a generic term entirely may be enough to give them pause. They will think twice before initiating one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: domain report</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/09/18/tenant-dispute-over-homeawayfromhome-com/comment-page-1/#comment-482149</link>
		<dc:creator>domain report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8243#comment-482149</guid>
		<description>&quot;home away from home&quot; is a common term that almost everyone has probably used at least once in their life to refer to somewhere they like.  Frank should get to keep this domain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;home away from home&#8221; is a common term that almost everyone has probably used at least once in their life to refer to somewhere they like.  Frank should get to keep this domain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Investor</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/09/18/tenant-dispute-over-homeawayfromhome-com/comment-page-1/#comment-481753</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8243#comment-481753</guid>
		<description>Quote-
&quot;reverse domain name hijacking is not becoming just as serious problem!&quot;

We are only at the beginning of this trend.
It will only stop after all of the low hanging fruit has been picked and we are gone.

Then, major companies will start going after each other.  We are already seeing this happen. (search DNW)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote-<br />
&#8220;reverse domain name hijacking is not becoming just as serious problem!&#8221;</p>
<p>We are only at the beginning of this trend.<br />
It will only stop after all of the low hanging fruit has been picked and we are gone.</p>
<p>Then, major companies will start going after each other.  We are already seeing this happen. (search DNW)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/09/18/tenant-dispute-over-homeawayfromhome-com/comment-page-1/#comment-481745</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8243#comment-481745</guid>
		<description>It amuses me to see how companies stoop low to capture running websites and do a reverse domain name hijacking just because they have battery of lawyers to go after generic domain name owners. Domain name squatting is one thing, reverse domain name hijacking is not becoming just as serious problem! 

I hope WIPO takes a wise decision on this one! 

Thx
G</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It amuses me to see how companies stoop low to capture running websites and do a reverse domain name hijacking just because they have battery of lawyers to go after generic domain name owners. Domain name squatting is one thing, reverse domain name hijacking is not becoming just as serious problem! </p>
<p>I hope WIPO takes a wise decision on this one! </p>
<p>Thx<br />
G</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sorin</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/09/18/tenant-dispute-over-homeawayfromhome-com/comment-page-1/#comment-481733</link>
		<dc:creator>Sorin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 15:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8243#comment-481733</guid>
		<description>There is a new vacation rentals website where you can book a vacation rental directly by owner.
Have a look at www.holidaysbyowner.com
It is pretty nice,although they seem to be at the beginning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a new vacation rentals website where you can book a vacation rental directly by owner.<br />
Have a look at <a href="http://www.holidaysbyowner.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.holidaysbyowner.com</a><br />
It is pretty nice,although they seem to be at the beginning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slavik</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/09/18/tenant-dispute-over-homeawayfromhome-com/comment-page-1/#comment-481529</link>
		<dc:creator>slavik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 00:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8243#comment-481529</guid>
		<description>That Frankie is one sharp dude. Not only do I marvel at the quality of his selections every time one comes to public attention like this. EVERY name is defenseble. That&#039;s the difference when one makes informed buying decisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Frankie is one sharp dude. Not only do I marvel at the quality of his selections every time one comes to public attention like this. EVERY name is defenseble. That&#8217;s the difference when one makes informed buying decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
