Comments on: Arbitrator Has Harsh Words for AOL in Domain Dispute http://domainnamewire.com/2009/09/11/arbitrator-has-harsh-words-for-aol-in-domain-dispute/ News and Views for the Domain Name Industry Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:35:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Domain Name Wire » News » Roche, Lego, and Google File Most Domain Arbitration Cases in 2009 - The Domain Industry's News Source http://domainnamewire.com/2009/09/11/arbitrator-has-harsh-words-for-aol-in-domain-dispute/comment-page-1/#comment-543166 Domain Name Wire » News » Roche, Lego, and Google File Most Domain Arbitration Cases in 2009 - The Domain Industry's News Source Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:39:54 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8119#comment-543166 [...] (26) - AOL lost one case in 2009. But it is delusional when it comes to [...]

[...] (26) – AOL lost one case in 2009. But it is delusional when it comes to [...]

]]> By: Andrew Allemann http://domainnamewire.com/2009/09/11/arbitrator-has-harsh-words-for-aol-in-domain-dispute/comment-page-1/#comment-479066 Andrew Allemann Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:41:55 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8119#comment-479066 Chip - as a matter of fact, the respondent pointed out that there is a software product called AutoBlog Chip – as a matter of fact, the respondent pointed out that there is a software product called AutoBlog

]]> By: Chip Meade http://domainnamewire.com/2009/09/11/arbitrator-has-harsh-words-for-aol-in-domain-dispute/comment-page-1/#comment-479026 Chip Meade Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:22:17 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8119#comment-479026 Funny thing is that I first thought of an automatic (or bot) blog product rather than car. That to me might be a TM able software or service. Intereting thought anyway. Funny thing is that I first thought of an automatic (or bot) blog product rather than car. That to me might be a TM able software or service. Intereting thought anyway.

]]> By: Andrew Allemann http://domainnamewire.com/2009/09/11/arbitrator-has-harsh-words-for-aol-in-domain-dispute/comment-page-1/#comment-478306 Andrew Allemann Fri, 11 Sep 2009 21:23:50 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8119#comment-478306 Johnny - this wasn't USPTO. In fact, I suspect the reason they haven't tried to trademark it with USPTO is because it would be rejected. Johnny – this wasn’t USPTO. In fact, I suspect the reason they haven’t tried to trademark it with USPTO is because it would be rejected.

]]> By: Domain Investor http://domainnamewire.com/2009/09/11/arbitrator-has-harsh-words-for-aol-in-domain-dispute/comment-page-1/#comment-478298 Domain Investor Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:56:48 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8119#comment-478298 In regards to the AutoBlogNews.com domain AOL won - "The Respondent failed to submit a Response in this proceeding." Whenever the respondent does not respond, 99% of the time they lose. And, the law firm justifies their job to the client plus bills the client for an excessive amount of time (and revenue). The law firm figured that the second guy would not fight it and they would win. Plus, maybe the law firm needed some additional billable hours. Now, the law firm and AOL have egg on their face. The next time they file, they will be more prepared. (Plus, more billable hours.) In regards to the AutoBlogNews.com domain AOL won –
“The Respondent failed to submit a Response in this proceeding.”

Whenever the respondent does not respond, 99% of the time they lose.
And, the law firm justifies their job to the client plus bills the client for an excessive amount of time (and revenue).

The law firm figured that the second guy would not fight it and they would win.
Plus, maybe the law firm needed some additional billable hours.

Now, the law firm and AOL have egg on their face. The next time they file, they will be more prepared. (Plus, more billable hours.)

]]> By: Johnny http://domainnamewire.com/2009/09/11/arbitrator-has-harsh-words-for-aol-in-domain-dispute/comment-page-1/#comment-478286 Johnny Fri, 11 Sep 2009 20:23:59 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8119#comment-478286 How the hell does AOL have rights for AutoBlog unless they are selling an unrelated product that gives it secondary meaning? "Auto Blog" is generic and should NEVER be allowed to be trademarked for an Auto Blog. Does CarBlog.com now have to worry about AOL? What a load of sh*t from the AOL and the USPTO !!! How the hell does AOL have rights for AutoBlog unless they are selling an unrelated product that gives it secondary meaning?

“Auto Blog” is generic and should NEVER be allowed to be trademarked for an Auto Blog.

Does CarBlog.com now have to worry about AOL?

What a load of sh*t from the AOL and the USPTO !!!

]]> By: Unasi http://domainnamewire.com/2009/09/11/arbitrator-has-harsh-words-for-aol-in-domain-dispute/comment-page-1/#comment-478215 Unasi Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:59:44 +0000 http://domainnamewire.com/?p=8119#comment-478215 NAF are the biggest SOBs from those UDRP bodies, probably most corrupted (or just most stupid, take your pick) NAF are the biggest SOBs from those UDRP bodies, probably most corrupted (or just most stupid, take your pick)

]]>