<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo! Change May Hurt Domain Parking Revenue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/08/14/yahoo-change-may-hurt-domain-parking-revenue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/08/14/yahoo-change-may-hurt-domain-parking-revenue/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 20:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/08/14/yahoo-change-may-hurt-domain-parking-revenue/comment-page-1/#comment-461696</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2009 18:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7768#comment-461696</guid>
		<description>At a minimum, this is not the place for this. Andrew you should delete these comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At a minimum, this is not the place for this. Andrew you should delete these comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/08/14/yahoo-change-may-hurt-domain-parking-revenue/comment-page-1/#comment-460949</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 05:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7768#comment-460949</guid>
		<description>I believe paying more for a good TQ and less for a low TQ makes sense and is a good move overall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe paying more for a good TQ and less for a low TQ makes sense and is a good move overall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/08/14/yahoo-change-may-hurt-domain-parking-revenue/comment-page-1/#comment-460915</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 03:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7768#comment-460915</guid>
		<description>Me as an advertiser can confirm that domain channel quality is almost as good as search quality. What is bad is Adsensse ads quality.

For TQ - it would be really great to be able to tell which domains ar causing lower TQ and be able to move them elsewhere (or to second account)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me as an advertiser can confirm that domain channel quality is almost as good as search quality. What is bad is Adsensse ads quality.</p>
<p>For TQ &#8211; it would be really great to be able to tell which domains ar causing lower TQ and be able to move them elsewhere (or to second account)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donny</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/08/14/yahoo-change-may-hurt-domain-parking-revenue/comment-page-1/#comment-460911</link>
		<dc:creator>Donny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 03:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7768#comment-460911</guid>
		<description>Rich - You are funny.

I always assumed Yahoo was charging a discount to the advertiser based on the TQ score, but just earlier this week I was told it was only on a select group of domains.  We are talking about on the short tail keywords that were being discounted to the advertiser and the partners.  I asked if they had specifics on what was a long tail vs short tail and it sounded like the short tail was anything with more than 10 clicks in a month across the entire network.

I think overall the new system will be good as long as you have good traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich &#8211; You are funny.</p>
<p>I always assumed Yahoo was charging a discount to the advertiser based on the TQ score, but just earlier this week I was told it was only on a select group of domains.  We are talking about on the short tail keywords that were being discounted to the advertiser and the partners.  I asked if they had specifics on what was a long tail vs short tail and it sounded like the short tail was anything with more than 10 clicks in a month across the entire network.</p>
<p>I think overall the new system will be good as long as you have good traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rich</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/08/14/yahoo-change-may-hurt-domain-parking-revenue/comment-page-1/#comment-460910</link>
		<dc:creator>rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 03:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7768#comment-460910</guid>
		<description>Its not convince.Parked.com&#039;s previous website parkednames was terminated by yahoo in the past and the scam continues via parked,dotzup,whypark and some others. This company is scam ,many people were scammed by them.Its the reality,parked force the websites to delete the real posts about them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its not convince.Parked.com&#8217;s previous website parkednames was terminated by yahoo in the past and the scam continues via parked,dotzup,whypark and some others. This company is scam ,many people were scammed by them.Its the reality,parked force the websites to delete the real posts about them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/08/14/yahoo-change-may-hurt-domain-parking-revenue/comment-page-1/#comment-460906</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 03:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7768#comment-460906</guid>
		<description>Rich - you&#039;re very convincing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich &#8211; you&#8217;re very convincing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rich</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/08/14/yahoo-change-may-hurt-domain-parking-revenue/comment-page-1/#comment-460896</link>
		<dc:creator>rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 02:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7768#comment-460896</guid>
		<description>This is already existing concept but not side of advertisers.Parking companies take discounted money when their publisher&#039;s tq scores are the lower  than 5 but advertisers was paying normally ,yahoo take full from advertisers ,cut from parking company.In my opinion this change is like that ,some scammer companies like parked.com can claim your tq score is low and pay low money ,dont believe scammers ,parked can do everything inorder to steal your money.The best thing is avoid to deal with scammer companies like parked.com the leader in scam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is already existing concept but not side of advertisers.Parking companies take discounted money when their publisher&#8217;s tq scores are the lower  than 5 but advertisers was paying normally ,yahoo take full from advertisers ,cut from parking company.In my opinion this change is like that ,some scammer companies like parked.com can claim your tq score is low and pay low money ,dont believe scammers ,parked can do everything inorder to steal your money.The best thing is avoid to deal with scammer companies like parked.com the leader in scam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

