<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EducationDynamics Snags a Generic Domain Through Arbitration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/24/educationdynamics-snags-a-generic-domain-through-arbitration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/24/educationdynamics-snags-a-generic-domain-through-arbitration/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 20:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helder</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/24/educationdynamics-snags-a-generic-domain-through-arbitration/comment-page-1/#comment-445664</link>
		<dc:creator>Helder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7477#comment-445664</guid>
		<description>Andrew i would agree with you if you talk about countries like China or North Korea where democracy doesn&#039;t exist.

I believe that in democratic countries that&#039;s harder to happen, cctld&#039;s are ruled by the laws of a particular country, and the laws are equal to all, or at least it gets near to that.

It&#039;s easier for a big company with millions on their pocket to influence UDRP, while influencing a court of law in a democratic country gets a bit harder, so at the moment i feel a lot more secure with cctld&#039;s than with gtld&#039;s.

Anyway i expect, and hope that good sense wins, and that generics are not taken away from domainers.

I&#039;m all against cybersquating and TM violations, but if someone owns a generic word as a TM, that person/company can&#039;t claim to have exclusivity in the use of domains with that word, simply put no one can own a language, a language is public property.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew i would agree with you if you talk about countries like China or North Korea where democracy doesn&#8217;t exist.</p>
<p>I believe that in democratic countries that&#8217;s harder to happen, cctld&#8217;s are ruled by the laws of a particular country, and the laws are equal to all, or at least it gets near to that.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s easier for a big company with millions on their pocket to influence UDRP, while influencing a court of law in a democratic country gets a bit harder, so at the moment i feel a lot more secure with cctld&#8217;s than with gtld&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Anyway i expect, and hope that good sense wins, and that generics are not taken away from domainers.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m all against cybersquating and TM violations, but if someone owns a generic word as a TM, that person/company can&#8217;t claim to have exclusivity in the use of domains with that word, simply put no one can own a language, a language is public property.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Menius</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/24/educationdynamics-snags-a-generic-domain-through-arbitration/comment-page-1/#comment-445662</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Menius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7477#comment-445662</guid>
		<description>G. Gervaise Davis III was spot on. Excellent logic, excellent argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G. Gervaise Davis III was spot on. Excellent logic, excellent argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/24/educationdynamics-snags-a-generic-domain-through-arbitration/comment-page-1/#comment-445593</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7477#comment-445593</guid>
		<description>&quot;Finally buy cctldâ€™s and let ICANN suffer in their pockets&quot;

You think the rules are tough on gTLDs?  Countries can basically take away your ccTLDs at will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Finally buy cctldâ€™s and let ICANN suffer in their pockets&#8221;</p>
<p>You think the rules are tough on gTLDs?  Countries can basically take away your ccTLDs at will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helder</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/24/educationdynamics-snags-a-generic-domain-through-arbitration/comment-page-1/#comment-445591</link>
		<dc:creator>Helder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7477#comment-445591</guid>
		<description>&quot;I need to find the cheapest and easiest country to file a trademark.&quot;

That&#039;s something i&#039;ve thought about already, owning TM of my domains.

Another good thing is put UDRP in a neutral country like Switzerland, that&#039;s what happens with almost every institution that rules something that&#039;s global.

It makes no sense that a country rules the internet gtld&#039;s.

Finally buy cctld&#039;s and let ICANN suffer in their pockets</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I need to find the cheapest and easiest country to file a trademark.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s something i&#8217;ve thought about already, owning TM of my domains.</p>
<p>Another good thing is put UDRP in a neutral country like Switzerland, that&#8217;s what happens with almost every institution that rules something that&#8217;s global.</p>
<p>It makes no sense that a country rules the internet gtld&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Finally buy cctld&#8217;s and let ICANN suffer in their pockets</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/24/educationdynamics-snags-a-generic-domain-through-arbitration/comment-page-1/#comment-445547</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7477#comment-445547</guid>
		<description>I say nuke USA and lets start over</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say nuke USA and lets start over</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What the</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/24/educationdynamics-snags-a-generic-domain-through-arbitration/comment-page-1/#comment-445517</link>
		<dc:creator>What the</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7477#comment-445517</guid>
		<description>This is a big world.  
Why should URRP penalize a european domain owner because there exist a small company in the U.S. that owns a trademark?

I believe this company has found it is easy to take a domain by UDRP instead of the old fashion way of buying it.  

I need to find the cheapest and easiest country to file a trademark.  

What will UDRP do then?  Rule against one TM owner because the TM is not in the U.S.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a big world.<br />
Why should URRP penalize a european domain owner because there exist a small company in the U.S. that owns a trademark?</p>
<p>I believe this company has found it is easy to take a domain by UDRP instead of the old fashion way of buying it.  </p>
<p>I need to find the cheapest and easiest country to file a trademark.  </p>
<p>What will UDRP do then?  Rule against one TM owner because the TM is not in the U.S.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Spielman</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/24/educationdynamics-snags-a-generic-domain-through-arbitration/comment-page-1/#comment-445495</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Spielman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7477#comment-445495</guid>
		<description>I love when dissenting judges or arbitrating Panelists say &quot;respectfully dissent&quot; because it was clear that he had no respect for the finding. I agree this was bunk decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love when dissenting judges or arbitrating Panelists say &#8220;respectfully dissent&#8221; because it was clear that he had no respect for the finding. I agree this was bunk decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

