<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: National Arbitration Forum Settles Suit with Attorney General</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/20/national-arbitration-forum-settles-suit-with-attorney-general/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/20/national-arbitration-forum-settles-suit-with-attorney-general/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 20:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: drp</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/20/national-arbitration-forum-settles-suit-with-attorney-general/comment-page-1/#comment-444139</link>
		<dc:creator>drp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7420#comment-444139</guid>
		<description>I owned two domain names that contained my last name for about five years.  Then a major corporation whose corporate name includes my name (but spelled differently) went after the domain names.    You can&#039;t trademark proper names,  so there was no trademark.

Although I bought the domain names well before disputes were supposed to go to arbitration,  the case went to the NAF.  I made a pretty good argument citing all sorts of precident to other NAF rulings,  but naturally lost.

As an experiment,  using the NAF I then went after another domain name which happened to include one of my registered trademarks.  I used the same argument which had been successful against me.  Naturally,  I lost here too,  this argument being complete BS.

Just one more bit of evidence that the NAF favors the big guys (who are likely to bring it more business ).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I owned two domain names that contained my last name for about five years.  Then a major corporation whose corporate name includes my name (but spelled differently) went after the domain names.    You can&#8217;t trademark proper names,  so there was no trademark.</p>
<p>Although I bought the domain names well before disputes were supposed to go to arbitration,  the case went to the NAF.  I made a pretty good argument citing all sorts of precident to other NAF rulings,  but naturally lost.</p>
<p>As an experiment,  using the NAF I then went after another domain name which happened to include one of my registered trademarks.  I used the same argument which had been successful against me.  Naturally,  I lost here too,  this argument being complete BS.</p>
<p>Just one more bit of evidence that the NAF favors the big guys (who are likely to bring it more business ).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Spielman</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/20/national-arbitration-forum-settles-suit-with-attorney-general/comment-page-1/#comment-443470</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Spielman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7420#comment-443470</guid>
		<description>Wow. I did not think NAF would cave that easily and that quickly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I did not think NAF would cave that easily and that quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick McDermott</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/20/national-arbitration-forum-settles-suit-with-attorney-general/comment-page-1/#comment-442822</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick McDermott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 21:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7420#comment-442822</guid>
		<description>Andrew,

Please read Michael Berg&#039;s take on this.

It&#039;s quite disturbing that the NAF is arbitrating domain dispute cases.

Anyone who lost a generic domain thru a NAF decision should really consider pressuring ICANN to have another Arbitrator review the case.

I hope all those credit card consumers who lost their arbitration cases under NAF will
also have recourse to have their cases reviewed.

See MHB&#039;s blog posting at The Domains here:
http://snurl.com/NAFReport</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,</p>
<p>Please read Michael Berg&#8217;s take on this.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s quite disturbing that the NAF is arbitrating domain dispute cases.</p>
<p>Anyone who lost a generic domain thru a NAF decision should really consider pressuring ICANN to have another Arbitrator review the case.</p>
<p>I hope all those credit card consumers who lost their arbitration cases under NAF will<br />
also have recourse to have their cases reviewed.</p>
<p>See MHB&#8217;s blog posting at The Domains here:<br />
<a href="http://snurl.com/NAFReport" rel="nofollow">http://snurl.com/NAFReport</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Latest Domainer News</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/20/national-arbitration-forum-settles-suit-with-attorney-general/comment-page-1/#comment-528830</link>
		<dc:creator>Latest Domainer News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7420#comment-528830</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;National Arbitration Forum Settles Suit with Attorney General - http://tinyurl.com/nqta5s&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">National Arbitration Forum Settles Suit with Attorney General &#8211; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/nqta5s" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/nqta5s</a></span></span></span></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

