<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GoDaddy Delivers a Blow to Dark Blue Sea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/17/godaddy-delivers-a-blow-to-dark-blue-sea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/17/godaddy-delivers-a-blow-to-dark-blue-sea/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 23:12:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Dark Blue Sea and GoDaddy Get Back Together - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/17/godaddy-delivers-a-blow-to-dark-blue-sea/comment-page-1/#comment-489563</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Dark Blue Sea and GoDaddy Get Back Together - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7380#comment-489563</guid>
		<description>[...] parent company of Fabulous, has had a rough year. It probably hit bottom back in July, when GoDaddy pulled out of a sales distribution agreement with the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] parent company of Fabulous, has had a rough year. It probably hit bottom back in July, when GoDaddy pulled out of a sales distribution agreement with the [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Domain Distribution Network Partners with Moniker - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/17/godaddy-delivers-a-blow-to-dark-blue-sea/comment-page-1/#comment-486869</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Domain Distribution Network Partners with Moniker - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7380#comment-486869</guid>
		<description>[...] is a nice win for DDN and Dark Blue Sea, although it is still reeling from the loss of a sales agreement with GoDaddy earlier this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] is a nice win for DDN and Dark Blue Sea, although it is still reeling from the loss of a sales agreement with GoDaddy earlier this [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/17/godaddy-delivers-a-blow-to-dark-blue-sea/comment-page-1/#comment-440947</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 01:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7380#comment-440947</guid>
		<description>Great points above by Robert Haastrup-Timmi, especially on educating the public. 

Where does the public have most of its contact with the industry?  In the process of attempting to register fresh domains.  Are GoDaddy, eNom or BuyDomains doing a good job of educating potential buyers about the benefits of the secondary market?

More to the point, is the happy path between a lookup for a fresh registration and the presentation of options in the secondary market smooth, quick or transparent? 

Do interfaces on GD and BuyDomains-partner-registrars have high abandon rates on the path to seeing what domains are available in the secondary market?  What are those rates?

How many GD or BD employees does it take to fix a broken UI?  How hard is it to create an ecommerce experience that pulls visitors into viewing available domains, then converts them into buyers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points above by Robert Haastrup-Timmi, especially on educating the public. </p>
<p>Where does the public have most of its contact with the industry?  In the process of attempting to register fresh domains.  Are GoDaddy, eNom or BuyDomains doing a good job of educating potential buyers about the benefits of the secondary market?</p>
<p>More to the point, is the happy path between a lookup for a fresh registration and the presentation of options in the secondary market smooth, quick or transparent? </p>
<p>Do interfaces on GD and BuyDomains-partner-registrars have high abandon rates on the path to seeing what domains are available in the secondary market?  What are those rates?</p>
<p>How many GD or BD employees does it take to fix a broken UI?  How hard is it to create an ecommerce experience that pulls visitors into viewing available domains, then converts them into buyers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/17/godaddy-delivers-a-blow-to-dark-blue-sea/comment-page-1/#comment-440882</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 00:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7380#comment-440882</guid>
		<description>Fabulous is just bunch of big-headed individuals who made lots of bad decisions and burned shareholders money</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fabulous is just bunch of big-headed individuals who made lots of bad decisions and burned shareholders money</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FX</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/17/godaddy-delivers-a-blow-to-dark-blue-sea/comment-page-1/#comment-440875</link>
		<dc:creator>FX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 23:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7380#comment-440875</guid>
		<description>i feel like all domainers should support Fabulous and DBS in one way or another.    They have done a lot for the industry over the years and continue to innovate and push the industry forward.  Fabulous is by far the best registrar in this industry. No other registrar even comes close. No other registrar offers a comprehensive set of tools such as Fabulous.  If you&#039;ve never used Fabulous, you should check it out. Not to mention parking program at fabulous performs well too.

.. just a satisfied Fabulous client.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i feel like all domainers should support Fabulous and DBS in one way or another.    They have done a lot for the industry over the years and continue to innovate and push the industry forward.  Fabulous is by far the best registrar in this industry. No other registrar even comes close. No other registrar offers a comprehensive set of tools such as Fabulous.  If you&#8217;ve never used Fabulous, you should check it out. Not to mention parking program at fabulous performs well too.</p>
<p>.. just a satisfied Fabulous client.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: global biz</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/17/godaddy-delivers-a-blow-to-dark-blue-sea/comment-page-1/#comment-440797</link>
		<dc:creator>global biz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7380#comment-440797</guid>
		<description>I consider GD the same as kmart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I consider GD the same as kmart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/17/godaddy-delivers-a-blow-to-dark-blue-sea/comment-page-1/#comment-440796</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7380#comment-440796</guid>
		<description>I hate to see this happen to this nice group of people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to see this happen to this nice group of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
