<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Arbitrator&#8217;s View of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/13/an-arbitrators-view-of-reverse-domain-name-hijacking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/13/an-arbitrators-view-of-reverse-domain-name-hijacking/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 20:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; If You&#8217;re Stupid, Domain Hijacking Clause Doesn&#8217;t Apply to You - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/13/an-arbitrators-view-of-reverse-domain-name-hijacking/comment-page-1/#comment-566353</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; If You&#8217;re Stupid, Domain Hijacking Clause Doesn&#8217;t Apply to You - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7271#comment-566353</guid>
		<description>[...] To understand one panelist&#8217;s analysis of RDNH, see this guest article from Hon. Neil Brown. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] To understand one panelist&#8217;s analysis of RDNH, see this guest article from Hon. Neil Brown. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Arbitrator Asks Good Questions About Expedited UDRP - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/13/an-arbitrators-view-of-reverse-domain-name-hijacking/comment-page-1/#comment-525211</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Arbitrator Asks Good Questions About Expedited UDRP - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7271#comment-525211</guid>
		<description>[...] have a box to check when the complainant commits reverse domain name hijacking. As Brown has pointed out before, a respondent doesn&#8217;t need to ask for RDNH in order for the panel to consider it. In fact, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] have a box to check when the complainant commits reverse domain name hijacking. As Brown has pointed out before, a respondent doesn&#8217;t need to ask for RDNH in order for the panel to consider it. In fact, [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/13/an-arbitrators-view-of-reverse-domain-name-hijacking/comment-page-1/#comment-464976</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 20:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7271#comment-464976</guid>
		<description>Hi Peter,

I wrote about that this morning :)

http://domainnamewire.com/2009/08/21/non-profit-urban-logic-guilty-of-reverse-domain-name-hijacking/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Peter,</p>
<p>I wrote about that this morning <img src='http://domainnamewire.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><a href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/08/21/non-profit-urban-logic-guilty-of-reverse-domain-name-hijacking/" rel="nofollow">http://domainnamewire.com/2009/08/21/non-profit-urban-logic-guilty-of-reverse-domain-name-hijacking/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Holland</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/13/an-arbitrators-view-of-reverse-domain-name-hijacking/comment-page-1/#comment-464928</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Holland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7271#comment-464928</guid>
		<description>For the record, we just won a UDRP case as a Respondant and got an RDNH finding.

We were WIPO D2009-0862

You can find it at:

http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2009/d2009-0862.html

Sometimes, the little guy can win after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, we just won a UDRP case as a Respondant and got an RDNH finding.</p>
<p>We were WIPO D2009-0862</p>
<p>You can find it at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2009/d2009-0862.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/html/2009/d2009-0862.html</a></p>
<p>Sometimes, the little guy can win after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AAA Auto Club Loses Dispute Over AAA.net_hkitos &#171; Hkitos&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/13/an-arbitrators-view-of-reverse-domain-name-hijacking/comment-page-1/#comment-450102</link>
		<dc:creator>AAA Auto Club Loses Dispute Over AAA.net_hkitos &#171; Hkitos&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7271#comment-450102</guid>
		<description>[...] did not find reverse domain name hijacking. However, The Hon Neil Brown QC, who has written a guest article for Domain Name Wire about how panels fail to find reverse domain name hijacking, wrote a dissent on RDNH. Brown wrote: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] did not find reverse domain name hijacking. However, The Hon Neil Brown QC, who has written a guest article for Domain Name Wire about how panels fail to find reverse domain name hijacking, wrote a dissent on RDNH. Brown wrote: [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; AAA Auto Club Loses Dispute Over AAA.net - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/13/an-arbitrators-view-of-reverse-domain-name-hijacking/comment-page-1/#comment-447880</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; AAA Auto Club Loses Dispute Over AAA.net - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7271#comment-447880</guid>
		<description>[...] did not find reverse domain name hijacking. However, The Hon Neil Brown QC, who has written a guest article for Domain Name Wire about how panels fail to find reverse domain name hijacking, wrote a dissent on RDNH. Brown wrote: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] did not find reverse domain name hijacking. However, The Hon Neil Brown QC, who has written a guest article for Domain Name Wire about how panels fail to find reverse domain name hijacking, wrote a dissent on RDNH. Brown wrote: [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/13/an-arbitrators-view-of-reverse-domain-name-hijacking/comment-page-1/#comment-439004</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 22:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7271#comment-439004</guid>
		<description>I bet after analyzing the decisions they will show a very unbalanced favor to pirate applicants in regards to generic words and phrases. It would be nice to see the results. Great topic, very timely.
Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet after analyzing the decisions they will show a very unbalanced favor to pirate applicants in regards to generic words and phrases. It would be nice to see the results. Great topic, very timely.<br />
Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

