<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lawyer Suggests Alternative to Rapid Domain Suspension Scheme</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/09/lawyer-suggests-alternative-to-rapid-domain-suspension-scheme/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/09/lawyer-suggests-alternative-to-rapid-domain-suspension-scheme/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:34:27 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: New York Attorney Urges Domainers To “Do Something” To Stop Frivolous Dispute Proceedings &#124; Domains News</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/09/lawyer-suggests-alternative-to-rapid-domain-suspension-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-438561</link>
		<dc:creator>New York Attorney Urges Domainers To “Do Something” To Stop Frivolous Dispute Proceedings &#124; Domains News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 05:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7236#comment-438561</guid>
		<description>[...] Note: Paul Keating, a Barcelona-based (but California licensed) lawyer specializing in intellectual property, has suggested a way to modify UDRP domain arbitration as to avoid rapid domain suspensions. Check it out here&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] Note: Paul Keating, a Barcelona-based (but California licensed) lawyer specializing in intellectual property, has suggested a way to modify UDRP domain arbitration as to avoid rapid domain suspensions. Check it out here&#8230; [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New York Attorney Urges Domainers To &#8220;Do Something&#8221; To Stop Frivolous Dispute Proceedings &#124; Domain Name News</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/09/lawyer-suggests-alternative-to-rapid-domain-suspension-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-438454</link>
		<dc:creator>New York Attorney Urges Domainers To &#8220;Do Something&#8221; To Stop Frivolous Dispute Proceedings &#124; Domain Name News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7236#comment-438454</guid>
		<description>[...] Note: Paul Keating, a Barcelona-based (but California licensed) lawyer specializing in intellectual property, has suggested a way to modify UDRP domain arbitration as to avoid rapid domain suspensions. Check it out here&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] Note: Paul Keating, a Barcelona-based (but California licensed) lawyer specializing in intellectual property, has suggested a way to modify UDRP domain arbitration as to avoid rapid domain suspensions. Check it out here&#8230; [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Menius</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/09/lawyer-suggests-alternative-to-rapid-domain-suspension-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-435633</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Menius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7236#comment-435633</guid>
		<description>Keating&#039;s proposal, as is, is already superior to and more balanced than the URS. Not to sound so critical, but this further illustrates how strange that ICANN can&#039;t simpy craft a revision to something that has worked effectively in many instances. Instead, they reinvent the wheel with something like URS that on face is a step backward. 

If ICANN push URS through, in lieu of better already available alternatives, you will once again have clear evidence of catering to deep pocket interests at the expense of thousands of domain name registrants. Yes, protect trademark holders. But don&#039;t launch a mechanism that will instantly harm registrants. 

What is required here to reach the appropriate outcome is internal integrity, good judgement, and a genuine interest in making the best decision that weighs all vested interests. Can ICANN meet these requirements?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keating&#8217;s proposal, as is, is already superior to and more balanced than the URS. Not to sound so critical, but this further illustrates how strange that ICANN can&#8217;t simpy craft a revision to something that has worked effectively in many instances. Instead, they reinvent the wheel with something like URS that on face is a step backward. </p>
<p>If ICANN push URS through, in lieu of better already available alternatives, you will once again have clear evidence of catering to deep pocket interests at the expense of thousands of domain name registrants. Yes, protect trademark holders. But don&#8217;t launch a mechanism that will instantly harm registrants. </p>
<p>What is required here to reach the appropriate outcome is internal integrity, good judgement, and a genuine interest in making the best decision that weighs all vested interests. Can ICANN meet these requirements?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/09/lawyer-suggests-alternative-to-rapid-domain-suspension-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-435471</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 22:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7236#comment-435471</guid>
		<description>Johnny - agree, perhaps a postcard saying &#039;you have a UDRP, go here...&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Johnny &#8211; agree, perhaps a postcard saying &#8216;you have a UDRP, go here&#8230;&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve M</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/09/lawyer-suggests-alternative-to-rapid-domain-suspension-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-435420</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7236#comment-435420</guid>
		<description>Overall, these ideas seem reasonable and fair to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overall, these ideas seem reasonable and fair to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seb</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/09/lawyer-suggests-alternative-to-rapid-domain-suspension-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-435388</link>
		<dc:creator>Seb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7236#comment-435388</guid>
		<description>Andrew, that was great writing about Paul Keating&#039;s proposal.
I definitely think fixing the UDRP this way is the way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, that was great writing about Paul Keating&#8217;s proposal.<br />
I definitely think fixing the UDRP this way is the way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/09/lawyer-suggests-alternative-to-rapid-domain-suspension-scheme/comment-page-1/#comment-435350</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7236#comment-435350</guid>
		<description>I think that notification needs to be by snail mail as well. Electronic submission is not enough.

Heck.....it could even just be a single envelope....just something more than one form of communication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that notification needs to be by snail mail as well. Electronic submission is not enough.</p>
<p>Heck&#8230;..it could even just be a single envelope&#8230;.just something more than one form of communication.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
