<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Board Battle Erupts at Dark Blue Sea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/09/board-battle-erupts-at-dark-blue-sea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/09/board-battle-erupts-at-dark-blue-sea/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:34:27 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; GoDaddy Delivers a Blow to Dark Blue Sea - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/09/board-battle-erupts-at-dark-blue-sea/comment-page-1/#comment-440743</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; GoDaddy Delivers a Blow to Dark Blue Sea - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7244#comment-440743</guid>
		<description>[...] are down by three quarters, it has cut half its staff, and one of its biggest shareholders is trying to oust its Chairman. But the news got worse yesterday, as reported by Domain Name News: GoDaddy terminated its sales [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] are down by three quarters, it has cut half its staff, and one of its biggest shareholders is trying to oust its Chairman. But the news got worse yesterday, as reported by Domain Name News: GoDaddy terminated its sales [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/09/board-battle-erupts-at-dark-blue-sea/comment-page-1/#comment-435673</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 02:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7244#comment-435673</guid>
		<description>Haha DBS talking about &quot;shareholder value&quot; which they created...NOT, they are burning money like on fire...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha DBS talking about &#8220;shareholder value&#8221; which they created&#8230;NOT, they are burning money like on fire&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Davids</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/09/board-battle-erupts-at-dark-blue-sea/comment-page-1/#comment-435376</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Davids</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7244#comment-435376</guid>
		<description>I was just looking at their stock (DBS) the other day...they actually make a profit which is more than most companies these days.

They may be a good buy at these prices so not surprised if a takeover is attempted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just looking at their stock (DBS) the other day&#8230;they actually make a profit which is more than most companies these days.</p>
<p>They may be a good buy at these prices so not surprised if a takeover is attempted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/09/board-battle-erupts-at-dark-blue-sea/comment-page-1/#comment-435356</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 19:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7244#comment-435356</guid>
		<description>&quot;discarding&quot; ?  Oh man, oh man....they just registered &quot;anything&quot; back in 2002 and 2003.  

I remember distinctly thinking back then, &quot;What they in the heck are they doing registering so many marginally relevant domains?&quot;.  They could have taken more time and registered better domains, but they bought in like they were late to the market, which they were a little...but still, a bad move ultimately.  I think this is biting them in the ass now and it is a huge burden to keep renewing those domains.

It&#039;s slash and burn time for many domain owners right now...including Fabulous and other behemoths.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;discarding&#8221; ?  Oh man, oh man&#8230;.they just registered &#8220;anything&#8221; back in 2002 and 2003.  </p>
<p>I remember distinctly thinking back then, &#8220;What they in the heck are they doing registering so many marginally relevant domains?&#8221;.  They could have taken more time and registered better domains, but they bought in like they were late to the market, which they were a little&#8230;but still, a bad move ultimately.  I think this is biting them in the ass now and it is a huge burden to keep renewing those domains.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s slash and burn time for many domain owners right now&#8230;including Fabulous and other behemoths.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
