<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Feedback on Implementation Recommendation Team Final Report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/06/feedback-on-irt-final-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/06/feedback-on-irt-final-report/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:15:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Lawyer Suggests Alternative to Rapid Domain Suspension Scheme - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/06/feedback-on-irt-final-report/comment-page-1/#comment-435246</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Lawyer Suggests Alternative to Rapid Domain Suspension Scheme - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 17:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7155#comment-435246</guid>
		<description>[...] comments submitted to ICANN regarding the Implementation Recommendation Team&#8217;s (IRT) final report. But attorney Paul Keating went a step further, suggesting a way to modify UDRP domain arbitration [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] comments submitted to ICANN regarding the Implementation Recommendation Team&#8217;s (IRT) final report. But attorney Paul Keating went a step further, suggesting a way to modify UDRP domain arbitration [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seb</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/06/feedback-on-irt-final-report/comment-page-1/#comment-433741</link>
		<dc:creator>Seb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7155#comment-433741</guid>
		<description>Great Andrew !

That could be the solution to everyone&#039;s headache and i think it deserves to be read by ICANN staff, trademark holders and domain name registrants.

Seb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Andrew !</p>
<p>That could be the solution to everyone&#8217;s headache and i think it deserves to be read by ICANN staff, trademark holders and domain name registrants.</p>
<p>Seb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/06/feedback-on-irt-final-report/comment-page-1/#comment-433736</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7155#comment-433736</guid>
		<description>Seb - I read a draft of it that was circulating via email.  I&#039;ll read the entire thing when I get a chance.  An article might be a good idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seb &#8211; I read a draft of it that was circulating via email.  I&#8217;ll read the entire thing when I get a chance.  An article might be a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seb</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/06/feedback-on-irt-final-report/comment-page-1/#comment-433645</link>
		<dc:creator>Seb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7155#comment-433645</guid>
		<description>Andrew,

Did you read Paul Keating&#039;s proposal to improve the current UDRP procedure instead of implementing the URS ?

His post can be found here : http://forum.icann.org/lists/irt-final-report/msg00190.html

The proposal starts at the end of page 17 in the pdf attached to his comment : http://forum.icann.org/lists/irt-final-report/pdfv2dSWZbHEC.pdf

This is by far the most brilliant proposal i&#039;ve read in a long time.
I sincerely think it&#039;s good for both trademarks owners facing obvious cybersquatting cases and for generic domain owners.

I know some ICANN people (even Rod Beckstrom) read your blog and i think it would be great if you could write an article about it.

Seb</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew,</p>
<p>Did you read Paul Keating&#8217;s proposal to improve the current UDRP procedure instead of implementing the URS ?</p>
<p>His post can be found here : <a href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/irt-final-report/msg00190.html" rel="nofollow">http://forum.icann.org/lists/irt-final-report/msg00190.html</a></p>
<p>The proposal starts at the end of page 17 in the pdf attached to his comment : <a href="http://forum.icann.org/lists/irt-final-report/pdfv2dSWZbHEC.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://forum.icann.org/lists/irt-final-report/pdfv2dSWZbHEC.pdf</a></p>
<p>This is by far the most brilliant proposal i&#8217;ve read in a long time.<br />
I sincerely think it&#8217;s good for both trademarks owners facing obvious cybersquatting cases and for generic domain owners.</p>
<p>I know some ICANN people (even Rod Beckstrom) read your blog and i think it would be great if you could write an article about it.</p>
<p>Seb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/06/feedback-on-irt-final-report/comment-page-1/#comment-433094</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7155#comment-433094</guid>
		<description>Darren - They will definitely read them.  What they choose to do with them is another matter.  Keep in mind there&#039;s a new boss at ICANN, and hopefully a new vibe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren &#8211; They will definitely read them.  What they choose to do with them is another matter.  Keep in mind there&#8217;s a new boss at ICANN, and hopefully a new vibe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Spielman</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/06/feedback-on-irt-final-report/comment-page-1/#comment-433093</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Spielman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 19:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7155#comment-433093</guid>
		<description>Andrew, what is the over/under on whether or not they will even read these submissions by the domain industry?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew, what is the over/under on whether or not they will even read these submissions by the domain industry?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Menius</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/06/feedback-on-irt-final-report/comment-page-1/#comment-433052</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Menius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7155#comment-433052</guid>
		<description>@Andrew - &quot;Let’s do this right. Let’s find a solution to protect all legitimate parties. Let’s do it through the appropriate process.&quot; 

Exactly. Fair &amp; balanced with due consideration made, not only to trademark holders, but also the millions of domain registrants around the world who stand to be victimized by the URS.

One would think ICANN do not have to be reminded of something so important &amp; so obvious. But ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Andrew &#8211; &#8220;Let’s do this right. Let’s find a solution to protect all legitimate parties. Let’s do it through the appropriate process.&#8221; </p>
<p>Exactly. Fair &amp; balanced with due consideration made, not only to trademark holders, but also the millions of domain registrants around the world who stand to be victimized by the URS.</p>
<p>One would think ICANN do not have to be reminded of something so important &amp; so obvious. But &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

