<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IRT: Classic Case Study of How Not to Sell a Plan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/29/irt-classic-case-study-of-how-not-to-sell-a-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/29/irt-classic-case-study-of-how-not-to-sell-a-plan/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:15:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Feedback on Implementation Recommendation Team Final Report - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/29/irt-classic-case-study-of-how-not-to-sell-a-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-432987</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Feedback on Implementation Recommendation Team Final Report - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 14:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7034#comment-432987</guid>
		<description>[...] of ICANN, and implore ICANN that IRT&#8217;s suggestions not move forward at this time. It is a classic case study in how not to develop and build consensus on an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] of ICANN, and implore ICANN that IRT&#8217;s suggestions not move forward at this time. It is a classic case study in how not to develop and build consensus on an [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David J Castello</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/29/irt-classic-case-study-of-how-not-to-sell-a-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-428696</link>
		<dc:creator>David J Castello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7034#comment-428696</guid>
		<description>As members of ICANN&#039;s Business Constituency, Michael and I agreed with Phil and supported an alternative proposal suggested by George Kirikos. The problem is that many in ICANN believe the new gTLDs and anything associated with them (such as the IRT) are blessed with an aura of fait accompli and anyone that slows down the process is persona non grata.  Rod Beckstrom really needs to get a handle on this runaway train.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As members of ICANN&#8217;s Business Constituency, Michael and I agreed with Phil and supported an alternative proposal suggested by George Kirikos. The problem is that many in ICANN believe the new gTLDs and anything associated with them (such as the IRT) are blessed with an aura of fait accompli and anyone that slows down the process is persona non grata.  Rod Beckstrom really needs to get a handle on this runaway train.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Corwin</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/29/irt-classic-case-study-of-how-not-to-sell-a-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-428653</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Corwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7034#comment-428653</guid>
		<description>Amen. As many know, ICA filed a protest with the ICANN Ombudsman, to little effect, that the IRT was operating in violation of relevant ICANN Bylaws.
There was tremendous push back against the process and the recommendations in Sydney from a broad array of individuals and interests, and compelling arguments made that its recommendations must go through the normal Policy Development Process. I&#039;ll be posting quite a bit this week on where things now stand with the IRT, and other key decisions made in Sydney,at www.internetcommerce.org over the course of this week. How the IRT Report is handled going forward will be a major test for Mr. Beckstrom and the ICANN Board.

Meanwhile, it is absolutely imperative that those concerned by the Report file comments by the July 6th due date (http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-4-29may09-en.htm ) and consider attending one of the follow-up sessions in NYC, London, or other locales (http://www.registration123.com/ICANN/GTLD/).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen. As many know, ICA filed a protest with the ICANN Ombudsman, to little effect, that the IRT was operating in violation of relevant ICANN Bylaws.<br />
There was tremendous push back against the process and the recommendations in Sydney from a broad array of individuals and interests, and compelling arguments made that its recommendations must go through the normal Policy Development Process. I&#8217;ll be posting quite a bit this week on where things now stand with the IRT, and other key decisions made in Sydney,at <a href="http://www.internetcommerce.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.internetcommerce.org</a> over the course of this week. How the IRT Report is handled going forward will be a major test for Mr. Beckstrom and the ICANN Board.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, it is absolutely imperative that those concerned by the Report file comments by the July 6th due date (<a href="http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-4-29may09-en.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-4-29may09-en.htm</a> ) and consider attending one of the follow-up sessions in NYC, London, or other locales (<a href="http://www.registration123.com/ICANN/GTLD/" rel="nofollow">http://www.registration123.com/ICANN/GTLD/</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Latest Domainer News</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/29/irt-classic-case-study-of-how-not-to-sell-a-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-528716</link>
		<dc:creator>Latest Domainer News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=7034#comment-528716</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;IRT: Classic Case Study of How Not to Sell a Plan - http://tinyurl.com/nmx3oe&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">IRT: Classic Case Study of How Not to Sell a Plan &#8211; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/nmx3oe" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/nmx3oe</a></span></span></span></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

