Comments on: National Arbitration Forum FAIL

By: UDRPtalk

UDRPtalk — Thu, 18 Feb 2010 03:57:28 +0000

Yes, I noticed that earlier.

I guess they are “diversifying” their loss with a hope of a win this time around.

By: Andrew Allemann

Andrew Allemann — Thu, 18 Feb 2010 01:19:00 +0000

@ UDRPtalk – and they switched arbitration providers

By: UDRPtalk

UDRPtalk — Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:16:45 +0000

Andrew,

Just noticed that another Double Jeopardy is possibly on the horizon:

http://www.udrpsearch.com/index.php?query=validas&search=domain

By: Domain Name Wire » News » National Arbitration Forum Panelist Sued for Judicial Misconduct - The Domain Industry's News Source

Wed, 22 Jul 2009 14:37:13 +0000

[...] was also the arbitrator on the recent MothersMilk.com case. She was the second arbitrator to hear what amounts to basically the same case. The first [...]

By: Richard Wixom

Richard Wixom — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:00:19 +0000

..”passive non-use also supports findings of bad faith registration and use…”.

Aren’t panelist required to follow the laws/rules and precedence? Was this panelist from Mars? And could this unreasoned and wholesale change now become a basis for future rulings? Scary.

By: Domain Investor

Domain Investor — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:12:14 +0000

Interesting point about panelist Johnson.
I never thought about that.

By: ben

ben — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:14:32 +0000

Carolyn Marks Johnson sole source of income seems to be from being a panelist. She always rules in favor of complainants, so she gets picked over and over. NAF needs corrupt panelists like Carolyn Johnson to stay in business.

Some common tricks used by NAF over and over is to not accepting resonses filed by respondents for various ridiculous reasons or not contacting the respondents. I for one will in due course be organizing a class action against this entity and forcing them to open their complete records./ correspondence log.