<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Study Questions if Consumers Want New Top Level Domains</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/09/study-questions-if-consumers-want-new-top-level-domains/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/09/study-questions-if-consumers-want-new-top-level-domains/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 20:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/09/study-questions-if-consumers-want-new-top-level-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-419650</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6777#comment-419650</guid>
		<description>I still believe one day will be possible to register *.*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still believe one day will be possible to register *.*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick McDermott</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/09/study-questions-if-consumers-want-new-top-level-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-419568</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick McDermott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6777#comment-419568</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Internet will become full of pointless
domain names..., messy and confusing...&quot;

Travel.hotel
Hotel.travel
Hotel.hotel
Travel.travel
...
...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Internet will become full of pointless<br />
domain names&#8230;, messy and confusing&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Travel.hotel<br />
Hotel.travel<br />
Hotel.hotel<br />
Travel.travel<br />
&#8230;<br />
&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Z</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/09/study-questions-if-consumers-want-new-top-level-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-419559</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6777#comment-419559</guid>
		<description>@David,

Well said. I couldn&#039;t agree with you more. The dot com&#039;s will shine and yes there is way to much self serving hype out there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@David,</p>
<p>Well said. I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more. The dot com&#8217;s will shine and yes there is way to much self serving hype out there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David J Castello</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/09/study-questions-if-consumers-want-new-top-level-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-419552</link>
		<dc:creator>David J Castello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6777#comment-419552</guid>
		<description>Good article, Andrew.
The bottom line is that it is highly unlikely anything is going to stop these new gTLDs because ICANN has $$$ in their eyes. Yes, it will lead to confusion on the Internet because these gTLD proponents seem to be incapable of truly understanding the masses. The masses (or the &quot;herd&quot; as I affectionally call them) accept new technology at about the speed of a pregnant snail - and tend to understand it as well. They don&#039;t like change unless it&#039;s forced upon them.  When the Internet revolution started, they had no choice but to embrace dotCom and they did so for all of their business names, business cards and stationary. Don&#039;t look for them to change horses mid-stream no matter how well you educate them.  They simply won&#039;t do it because they will consider it an unnecessary expense.   

99.9% of the hoopla about these gTLDs is coming from ICANN, registrars and consultants.  On a selfish level, I&#039;m looking forward  to these new gTLDs because they will push our generic dotCom values through the roof.  As opposed to diluting their value from market saturation, generic dotCom and primary Geodomains will bob to the top of this marketing &amp; branding confusion like a cork. 

Your notes about the trust factor go to the heart of any new TLD.  DotCom and ccTLds have a major trust factor with the public.  Watch when happens when one of these gTLDs is poorly administrated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article, Andrew.<br />
The bottom line is that it is highly unlikely anything is going to stop these new gTLDs because ICANN has $$$ in their eyes. Yes, it will lead to confusion on the Internet because these gTLD proponents seem to be incapable of truly understanding the masses. The masses (or the &#8220;herd&#8221; as I affectionally call them) accept new technology at about the speed of a pregnant snail &#8211; and tend to understand it as well. They don&#8217;t like change unless it&#8217;s forced upon them.  When the Internet revolution started, they had no choice but to embrace dotCom and they did so for all of their business names, business cards and stationary. Don&#8217;t look for them to change horses mid-stream no matter how well you educate them.  They simply won&#8217;t do it because they will consider it an unnecessary expense.   </p>
<p>99.9% of the hoopla about these gTLDs is coming from ICANN, registrars and consultants.  On a selfish level, I&#8217;m looking forward  to these new gTLDs because they will push our generic dotCom values through the roof.  As opposed to diluting their value from market saturation, generic dotCom and primary Geodomains will bob to the top of this marketing &amp; branding confusion like a cork. </p>
<p>Your notes about the trust factor go to the heart of any new TLD.  DotCom and ccTLds have a major trust factor with the public.  Watch when happens when one of these gTLDs is poorly administrated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Latest Domainer News</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/09/study-questions-if-consumers-want-new-top-level-domains/comment-page-1/#comment-529409</link>
		<dc:creator>Latest Domainer News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6777#comment-529409</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Study Questions if Consumers Want New Top Level Domains - http://tinyurl.com/ncmh2m&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Study Questions if Consumers Want New Top Level Domains &#8211; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/ncmh2m" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/ncmh2m</a></span></span></span></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

