<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will VeriSign Hold Domain Name Prices Steady this Year?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/08/will-verisign-hold-domain-name-prices-steady-this-year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/08/will-verisign-hold-domain-name-prices-steady-this-year/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 20:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; VeriSign Isn&#8217;t Stupid. That&#8217;s Why It&#8217;s Raising .Com Prices - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/08/will-verisign-hold-domain-name-prices-steady-this-year/comment-page-1/#comment-529598</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; VeriSign Isn&#8217;t Stupid. That&#8217;s Why It&#8217;s Raising .Com Prices - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6742#comment-529598</guid>
		<description>[...] year (this year), VeriSign didn&#8217;t raise rates. Although the economy may have played a factor, the real reason was politics. VeriSign was being trotted in front of congress this year to testify about ICANN and the end of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] year (this year), VeriSign didn&#8217;t raise rates. Although the economy may have played a factor, the real reason was politics. VeriSign was being trotted in front of congress this year to testify about ICANN and the end of [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Investor</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/08/will-verisign-hold-domain-name-prices-steady-this-year/comment-page-1/#comment-419139</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6742#comment-419139</guid>
		<description>EM, 
You would be a sitting duck for a renewal increase for your domain - King.net .

I&#039;m sure they would want more than a $ 7. renewal fee. 

Maybe, that is why Rick S. sold a couple domains this year.  Rick tends to be ahead of the curve.
:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EM,<br />
You would be a sitting duck for a renewal increase for your domain &#8211; King.net .</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure they would want more than a $ 7. renewal fee. </p>
<p>Maybe, that is why Rick S. sold a couple domains this year.  Rick tends to be ahead of the curve.<br />
 <img src='http://domainnamewire.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/08/will-verisign-hold-domain-name-prices-steady-this-year/comment-page-1/#comment-419094</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6742#comment-419094</guid>
		<description>VeriSign might also look at this as their last chance to get that fee hike if they believe they might get their monopoly rights revoked some time here soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VeriSign might also look at this as their last chance to get that fee hike if they believe they might get their monopoly rights revoked some time here soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EM @ KING.NET</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/08/will-verisign-hold-domain-name-prices-steady-this-year/comment-page-1/#comment-419092</link>
		<dc:creator>EM @ KING.NET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6742#comment-419092</guid>
		<description>They are well known controlling a good profit in domain name, a perfect example is the pricing set for &quot;premium&quot; .tv domain names. Since this is working for them already, why not apply it to premium .com and .net when they expires. I will not be surprise to see this changes in the future. I hope other company beat them for the renewal of .com .net and even for .tv rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are well known controlling a good profit in domain name, a perfect example is the pricing set for &#8220;premium&#8221; .tv domain names. Since this is working for them already, why not apply it to premium .com and .net when they expires. I will not be surprise to see this changes in the future. I hope other company beat them for the renewal of .com .net and even for .tv rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Latest Domainer News</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/08/will-verisign-hold-domain-name-prices-steady-this-year/comment-page-1/#comment-528480</link>
		<dc:creator>Latest Domainer News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6742#comment-528480</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Will VeriSign Hold Domain Name Prices Steady this Year? - http://tinyurl.com/nk2te4&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Will VeriSign Hold Domain Name Prices Steady this Year? &#8211; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/nk2te4" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/nk2te4</a></span></span></span></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

