<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congress Beats Up ICANN (Part 1)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/04/congress-beats-up-icann-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/04/congress-beats-up-icann-part-1/</link>
	<description>Domain Name Industry News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 20:25:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Congress Preparing to Beat up ICANN Again - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/04/congress-beats-up-icann-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-877319</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Congress Preparing to Beat up ICANN Again - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 15:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6692#comment-877319</guid>
		<description>[...] Twomey to task for a number of grievances. It was ugly. (You can read my coverage of that hearing here, here, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] Twomey to task for a number of grievances. It was ugly. (You can read my coverage of that hearing here, here, and [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Buzz - This Week in Domaining &#124; dot sauce &#124;</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/04/congress-beats-up-icann-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-422985</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Buzz - This Week in Domaining &#124; dot sauce &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 20:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6692#comment-422985</guid>
		<description>[...] - Congress Beats Up ICANN, 3 Part Series: &#8220;members of the House Subcommittee on Communications, Technology, and the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] &#8211; Congress Beats Up ICANN, 3 Part Series: &#8220;members of the House Subcommittee on Communications, Technology, and the [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Monday&#8217;s Domain News Bytes - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/04/congress-beats-up-icann-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-419090</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Monday&#8217;s Domain News Bytes - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6692#comment-419090</guid>
		<description>[...] Paul Twomey still smarting from last week&#8217;s congressional hearings? That was an embarrassment to ICANN. It seems that the only lobbying ICANN did ahead of the hearings was to get letters from Al Gore [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] Paul Twomey still smarting from last week&#8217;s congressional hearings? That was an embarrassment to ICANN. It seems that the only lobbying ICANN did ahead of the hearings was to get letters from Al Gore [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Buzz - This Week in Domaining</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/04/congress-beats-up-icann-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-417902</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Buzz - This Week in Domaining</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 20:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6692#comment-417902</guid>
		<description>[...] - Congress Beats Up ICANN, 3 Part Series: &#8220;members of the House Subcommittee on Communications, Technology, and the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] &#8211; Congress Beats Up ICANN, 3 Part Series: &#8220;members of the House Subcommittee on Communications, Technology, and the [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/04/congress-beats-up-icann-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-417781</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6692#comment-417781</guid>
		<description>@ Colin - although I didn&#039;t think that was well articulated by the Congressman, don&#039;t blame the U.S. for the U.N.  And we certainly don&#039;t want ICANN to become like the U.N....which is part of the reason the JPA should be extended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Colin &#8211; although I didn&#8217;t think that was well articulated by the Congressman, don&#8217;t blame the U.S. for the U.N.  And we certainly don&#8217;t want ICANN to become like the U.N&#8230;.which is part of the reason the JPA should be extended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/04/congress-beats-up-icann-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-417777</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6692#comment-417777</guid>
		<description>@ Drewbert - they&#039;ll answer it, it just may not be the complete answer you want to here.  I think it&#039;s good ICANN is doing this, but &quot;real&quot; answers are done live.  They won&#039;t get through all of the questions and will have time to respond accordingly at a later date with spin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Drewbert &#8211; they&#8217;ll answer it, it just may not be the complete answer you want to here.  I think it&#8217;s good ICANN is doing this, but &#8220;real&#8221; answers are done live.  They won&#8217;t get through all of the questions and will have time to respond accordingly at a later date with spin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drewbert</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/04/congress-beats-up-icann-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-417774</link>
		<dc:creator>Drewbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6692#comment-417774</guid>
		<description>&gt;and with full expectation of an answer either during or &gt;after the Sydney meeting later this month.

Of course, &quot;full expectation of an answer&quot; doesn&#039;t mean there&#039;ll actually be an answer forthcoming.

ICANN is expert at not answering questions they don&#039;t care to.


Kieran&#039;s become very good at political double-speak since moving over to the dark side.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;and with full expectation of an answer either during or &gt;after the Sydney meeting later this month.</p>
<p>Of course, &#8220;full expectation of an answer&#8221; doesn&#8217;t mean there&#8217;ll actually be an answer forthcoming.</p>
<p>ICANN is expert at not answering questions they don&#8217;t care to.</p>
<p>Kieran&#8217;s become very good at political double-speak since moving over to the dark side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

