<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congress Beats Up ICANN (Part 2)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/04/congress-beat-up-icann-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/04/congress-beat-up-icann-part-2/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:17:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Congress: Create Permanent Tie to ICANN - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/04/congress-beat-up-icann-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-453909</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Congress: Create Permanent Tie to ICANN - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 22:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6699#comment-453909</guid>
		<description>[...] letter comes on the heels of a hearing about ICANN, in which the organization did not fair [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] letter comes on the heels of a hearing about ICANN, in which the organization did not fair [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/04/congress-beat-up-icann-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-417543</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 01:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6699#comment-417543</guid>
		<description>&quot;I meant to add another important domain - DNW.com $ 100K per yr. &quot;

The market won&#039;t bare that :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I meant to add another important domain &#8211; DNW.com $ 100K per yr. &#8221;</p>
<p>The market won&#8217;t bare that <img src='http://domainnamewire.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Investor</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/04/congress-beat-up-icann-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-417504</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 23:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6699#comment-417504</guid>
		<description>&quot;charge whatever the market will bare.&quot;

Sorry.  
I meant to add another important domain -
DNW.com $ 100K per yr. 

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;charge whatever the market will bare.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry.<br />
I meant to add another important domain -<br />
DNW.com $ 100K per yr. </p>
<p> <img src='http://domainnamewire.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Investor</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/04/congress-beat-up-icann-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-417445</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6699#comment-417445</guid>
		<description>I only watched the last 1/3rd of the hearing.

When Verisign was asked why they needed the increase, he said they needed it to buid up the back office operation. (paraphrasing).
I wonder if only a small part of the increase went towards that?

When asked if they plan any more increases, he said he didn&#039;t know.  I guess he didn&#039;t want to get caught lieing to Congress. 
You know they will max. out the Icann contract. Who are they kidding?

Plus, I&#039;m sure they want the ability to charge whatever the market will bare.  
Google.com - $ 1. mil. a yr.  ??
AOL.com - $ 1. mil a yr. ??
NBC.com, Hotels.com, etc, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only watched the last 1/3rd of the hearing.</p>
<p>When Verisign was asked why they needed the increase, he said they needed it to buid up the back office operation. (paraphrasing).<br />
I wonder if only a small part of the increase went towards that?</p>
<p>When asked if they plan any more increases, he said he didn&#8217;t know.  I guess he didn&#8217;t want to get caught lieing to Congress.<br />
You know they will max. out the Icann contract. Who are they kidding?</p>
<p>Plus, I&#8217;m sure they want the ability to charge whatever the market will bare.<br />
Google.com &#8211; $ 1. mil. a yr.  ??<br />
AOL.com &#8211; $ 1. mil a yr. ??<br />
NBC.com, Hotels.com, etc, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Fulton</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/04/congress-beat-up-icann-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-529360</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Fulton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:27:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6699#comment-529360</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Congress Beats Up ICANN (Part 2): http://bit.ly/GeDJP&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Congress Beats Up ICANN (Part 2): <a href="http://bit.ly/GeDJP" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/GeDJP</a></span></span></span></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Congress Beats Up ICANN (Part 1) - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/04/congress-beat-up-icann-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-417421</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Congress Beats Up ICANN (Part 1) - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6699#comment-417421</guid>
		<description>[...] Articles Congress Beats Up ICANN (Part 3)Congress Beat Up ICANN (Part 2)Congress Beats Up ICANN (Part 1)Technology Policy Institute To Speak at ICANN HearingsCountry Code [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] Articles Congress Beats Up ICANN (Part 3)Congress Beat Up ICANN (Part 2)Congress Beats Up ICANN (Part 1)Technology Policy Institute To Speak at ICANN HearingsCountry Code [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Latest Domainer News</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/04/congress-beat-up-icann-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-529361</link>
		<dc:creator>Latest Domainer News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 19:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6699#comment-529361</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Congress Beat Up ICANN (Part 2) - http://tinyurl.com/p9td2u&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Congress Beat Up ICANN (Part 2) &#8211; <a href="http://tinyurl.com/p9td2u" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/p9td2u</a></span></span></span></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
