<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Domain Names a Topic on Capitol Hill Thursday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/03/domain-names-a-topic-on-capitol-hill-thursday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/03/domain-names-a-topic-on-capitol-hill-thursday/</link>
	<description>News and Views for the Domain Name Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:49:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Technology Policy Institute To Speak at ICANN Hearings - The Domain Industry's News Source</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/03/domain-names-a-topic-on-capitol-hill-thursday/comment-page-1/#comment-417319</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Name Wire &#187; News &#187; Technology Policy Institute To Speak at ICANN Hearings - The Domain Industry's News Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6662#comment-417319</guid>
		<description>[...] Roundtable Keynote and Discount Offer$3M Candy.com Sale Gives Domain Name Industry a BoostDomain Names a Topic on Capitol Hill ThursdayThe Incredible Mutating Domain Appraisal ScamDomain Name Registration Growth: Up or Down?Moviles.net [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p>[...] Roundtable Keynote and Discount Offer$3M Candy.com Sale Gives Domain Name Industry a BoostDomain Names a Topic on Capitol Hill ThursdayThe Incredible Mutating Domain Appraisal ScamDomain Name Registration Growth: Up or Down?Moviles.net [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Allemann</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/03/domain-names-a-topic-on-capitol-hill-thursday/comment-page-1/#comment-417279</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Allemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6662#comment-417279</guid>
		<description>@ Abigail - there are many ways a non-profit can benefit from this, as &lt;a href=&quot;http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/17/study-reform-icann-before-privatizing-it/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;described in a recent Technology Policy Institute study&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Abigail &#8211; there are many ways a non-profit can benefit from this, as <a href="http://domainnamewire.com/2009/03/17/study-reform-icann-before-privatizing-it/" rel="nofollow">described in a recent Technology Policy Institute study</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abigail</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/03/domain-names-a-topic-on-capitol-hill-thursday/comment-page-1/#comment-417115</link>
		<dc:creator>Abigail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 04:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6662#comment-417115</guid>
		<description>&quot;I believe some (most??) domainers feel Icann has an agenda to benefit themselves first.&quot;

As a non-profit, how does ICANN benefit specifically from any of this?

I think Paul Levins and the rest of the ICANN team do a fantastic job in the face of non-stop, hysterical criticism at every turn. I have never encountered an organization that is MORE transparent and open to input than ICANN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I believe some (most??) domainers feel Icann has an agenda to benefit themselves first.&#8221;</p>
<p>As a non-profit, how does ICANN benefit specifically from any of this?</p>
<p>I think Paul Levins and the rest of the ICANN team do a fantastic job in the face of non-stop, hysterical criticism at every turn. I have never encountered an organization that is MORE transparent and open to input than ICANN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domain Investor</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/03/domain-names-a-topic-on-capitol-hill-thursday/comment-page-1/#comment-417076</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 02:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6662#comment-417076</guid>
		<description>Paul, 
Thank you for posting.  You make it seem Icann is transparent.  But, I believe some (most??) domainers feel Icann has an agenda to benefit themselves first.  And, only make themselves look transparent and ignore the average stakeholder.

Plus, &quot;I&quot; feel Icann is scared of the IP lawyers so they are giving them beneficial treatment at the expense of domainers.

 http://www.icann.org/en/biog/levins.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,<br />
Thank you for posting.  You make it seem Icann is transparent.  But, I believe some (most??) domainers feel Icann has an agenda to benefit themselves first.  And, only make themselves look transparent and ignore the average stakeholder.</p>
<p>Plus, &#8220;I&#8221; feel Icann is scared of the IP lawyers so they are giving them beneficial treatment at the expense of domainers.</p>
<p> <a href="http://www.icann.org/en/biog/levins.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.icann.org/en/biog/levins.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalie Gauthier</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/03/domain-names-a-topic-on-capitol-hill-thursday/comment-page-1/#comment-528882</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalie Gauthier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 01:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6662#comment-528882</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @ilawguide Domain Names a Topic on Capitol Hill Thursday http://is.gd/NDPt&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="background-color: #FFfbd0">
<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @ilawguide Domain Names a Topic on Capitol Hill Thursday <a href="http://is.gd/NDPt" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/NDPt</a></span></span></span></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DS</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/03/domain-names-a-topic-on-capitol-hill-thursday/comment-page-1/#comment-416957</link>
		<dc:creator>DS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 22:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6662#comment-416957</guid>
		<description>People still use Godaddy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People still use Godaddy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Levins</title>
		<link>http://domainnamewire.com/2009/06/03/domain-names-a-topic-on-capitol-hill-thursday/comment-page-1/#comment-416921</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Levins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://domainnamewire.com/?p=6662#comment-416921</guid>
		<description>To suggest that ICANN is not taking transparency seriously is frankly nonsense. Name another organization that posts all correspondence inbound and out on-line; holds public Board meetings every four months in front of a 1000 people in a different geographic location each time; provides detailed minutes of its monthly Board meetings on line within days of them occurring; has an independent Ombudsman; has Mp3 recordings of discussions in its supporting organizations back as far as 2003 posted on-line, has had a review of its transparency done by an independent UK organization that found it was probably one of the most transparent organizations globally, ran 100&#039;s of public consultations last year (like all of the 11 years of its establishment), translates into the 5 UN languages and transcribes and broadcasts its meetings for those who can&#039;t attend and is completely open and free to attend for those who can.  GoDaddy knows that through its attendance at all these meetings.  Or if they don&#039;t they haven&#039;t being attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To suggest that ICANN is not taking transparency seriously is frankly nonsense. Name another organization that posts all correspondence inbound and out on-line; holds public Board meetings every four months in front of a 1000 people in a different geographic location each time; provides detailed minutes of its monthly Board meetings on line within days of them occurring; has an independent Ombudsman; has Mp3 recordings of discussions in its supporting organizations back as far as 2003 posted on-line, has had a review of its transparency done by an independent UK organization that found it was probably one of the most transparent organizations globally, ran 100&#8242;s of public consultations last year (like all of the 11 years of its establishment), translates into the 5 UN languages and transcribes and broadcasts its meetings for those who can&#8217;t attend and is completely open and free to attend for those who can.  GoDaddy knows that through its attendance at all these meetings.  Or if they don&#8217;t they haven&#8217;t being attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

